this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
85 points (95.7% liked)

Selfhosted

61512 readers
1263 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Preview

Materialious is usable on Web, Android (TV too) & Desktop.

It can be used with Invidious or using its own YouTube backend.

Has its own account system with end-to-end encryption for subscriptions.

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 20 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Help me understand what this does. It looks like it run on your own device and fetches YouTube videos you want to see, presenting them to you through its interface without ads and shit.

So I could throw it in my server and have my phone pull up its page and play content right?

[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Similar to Invideous, et al. You Tube front end.

[–] taperi@piefed.social 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I was gonna say, how is this different from invidious?

[–] Ward 4 points 6 months ago

This can actually use Invidious as its backend if someone wants to.

Its basically just a more feature rich Invidious whata easier to deploy.

[–] Arkhive@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 months ago

Yes, exactly.

[–] Ward 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Materialious can be deployed in a lot of ways.

It can be used purely as a Invidious frontend.

You can use it as a web server with its own YouTube engine and account system.

Or you can use it as a Desktop & Mobile app with or without Invidious.

Or you can even go into the advanced settings and choose when you want to use Invidious APIs or Materialious

[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (4 children)

The thing about these front ends is that Google will eventually get around to blocking your IP. After many unsuccessful attempts that got ban hammered after a week or so, I finally got it to work. I piped it through Cloudflare Tunnels/Zero Trust. Haven't had an issue. My deployment was the Invideous with companion app. The Companion app has been complaining about being unhealthy for ages now, but it keeps right on ticking. I don't watch a huge number of YT videos. Usually my consumption is a tutorial here or there.

[–] Buck@jlai.lu 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I don’t think any non public instance has any chance of being blocked. It simply looks like one user among millions to them.

[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Just my experience. Like I said, the only thing I use it for is to watch a tutorial without endless, unskippable ads just to find out the tut is trash.

[–] sam@piefed.ca 3 points 6 months ago

I've been running invidious on my home network for over a year now, no issues other than when YouTube makes changes that break for every inv user anyway.

[–] Ward 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah if you are running a private instance, you look like legitimate traffic to Google.

[–] nfreak@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

I route my Invidious containers through Gluetun and it usually works fine. Occasionally I need to restart the stack to change the IP but for the most part it works great.

[–] Buck@jlai.lu 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I can’t seem to prove I’m not a robot on the selfhosted docker install… shame. I’m stuck at “verifying…”

[–] Ward 1 points 6 months ago

We altcha whats a proof of work captcha. Are you getting any console errors? You do have to wait for the captcha to complete for a bit too.

[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 months ago

watch YouTube videos privately IF the apps works...