173
Candace Owens and Ben Shapiro Are Trying To Destroy Each Other
(www.newsweek.com)
How can we help?
Yo dawg. Did you hear what he called her?
She said his what was what?
load more comments
(1 replies)
And nothing of value was lost.
message to Twitter, formerly X
Nobody tells me anything around here.
Oh I didn't tell you, I changed it back.
She added in another post to Shapiro: "You have been acting unprofessional and emotionally unhinged for weeks now
Oh Candace... You have some googling to do if you think it's only been weeks.
This is the first time in a long time where you can say "no matter who loses, we win," instead of the other way around.
They could both fail to destroy the other.
load more comments
(3 replies)
How can we help them do it?
Owens tweeted:
No government anywhere has a right to commit a genocide, ever. There is no justification for a genocide. I can't believe this even needs to be said or is even considered the least bit controversial to state.
That is what drew the ire of Shapiro.
"The question is about Candace Owens," Shapiro said in the video posted to X by user @LoomerLs. "I think her behavior during this has been disgraceful, without a doubt."
Shapiro's answer was met with applause from the audience, followed by his acknowledgment that Owens "still works at my company."
"I think that her faux sophistication on these particular issues has been ridiculous," Shapiro added. "Everybody can see the moves that she's making and the things that she's saying, and I find them disreputable."
"faux sophistication". Pot calling kettle black.
Just using the term "faux sophistication" is faux sophistication if I've ever seen it.
I don't think I've ever seen a more pretentious douchebag other than Jordan Peterson.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Who, Ben? Fucking Aquaman?!
🍿 🍿 🍿
These people can't stand eachother, they are all grifters and it's so easy to pit them against eachother.
Is this a strategy that could be stimulated, somehow?
For sure it could. There is always at least one thing that they disagree on. When one of them is a woman, it happens by itself.
In the immortal words of Dr Ishiro Serizawa:
“Let them fight”
Two monumental pieces of human garbage. Can't wait.
I mean, why would boy-hitler hate a black person who is also a woman? Does he not see that she agrees with him that only conservative straight white men are jesus' chosen leaders for planet earth and that non-conservatives should be slaughtered wholesale?
Why would girl-Hitler hate a jew? Does she not see that he agrees with her that only Christian Conservative males are Jesus’ chosen leaders for planet earth and that non-Christians should be slaughtered wholesale?
Back in the day, Reagan wanted a 'Big Tent.' Nowadays, the Gipper is just another RINO neoliberal
"better to have them inside the tent pissing out than outside pissing in"
Well, now they're inside the tent and pissing all over the floor
"A Flash Of Green" by John D. MacDonald. Great little novel about a Florida land grab and local corruption. Written in the Kennedy years.
A one point, the main political boss sends one of his stooges to get rid of the married banker's girl friend. The stooge asks what's wrong with the banker getting a little action on the side. The boss tells the stooge that the banker is being too brazen and people are startign to talk. They plot needs the banker to look clean.
If they did the story today, the plotters wouldn't send her out of town, they'd make her head of the 'Sluts For Trump.'
TIL Candace Owens. For th lazy: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candace_Owens
She's a token black American conservative, and conspiracy theorist. She has a political talk show on the Daily Wire which is a conservative propaganda outlet.
A lot of these conservative talking heads, including Candace Owens, are just actors recruited from a talent agency
Paid actor implies she's scripted and saying other people's words. She might parrot right wing talking points, but shes doing it because she's a grifter.
Shapiro is a failed showbiz writer, too. Hmmmmmm...
Add to that the Daily Wire is Shapiros shitrag, so he’s her boss in this situation.
Ok.
I’ll grab the popcorn! Who wants butter?!
Good.
GRIFT ROYALE!
Cool
Let them continue.
Simpsons monkey fight.gif
Best wishes to both.
this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
173 points (90.2% liked)
politics
30930 readers
2494 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS