119
submitted 6 months ago by morrowind@lemmy.ml to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

I'm not the author, just sharing.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 51 points 6 months ago

I mean.....yeah. The guy who created Bluesky is the same guy who created Twitter originally. What makes you think anything would be different? I'm honestly surprised they're even humoring the idea of decentralization.

[-] Stern@lemmy.world 43 points 6 months ago

He also left Bluesky in 2024 after it didn't become the libertarian techbro wankfest he envisioned and was instead heavily populated by folks who didn't want to slob Elon's knob.

[-] 73ms@sopuli.xyz 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

He publicly distanced himself but Bluesky's ownership is very opaque and they do dishonest PR very well so I would not be at all surprised if Dorsey still owns a part of it.

[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

And he fucked a potato after peeling it and putting it in a sandwich baggy!

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Are you asking people to send you photos of that?

[-] hanrahan@piefed.social 1 points 6 months ago

sure and he left.twitter, him ostensibly leaving doesn't make it any better. The entire way its set up is the failure, it's yet another shitstain on the internet.

[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago

I do think the people behind it like the idea of data portability and decen, just not enough to compromise their business for it.

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

This seems to be the closest to a reasoned argument in this thread. Realistically, what should they be doing differently?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kushan@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago

The main argument against bsky is that they're still holding all of your data, unless you self host your own server.

I don't actually see how Lemmy is much different. Most users are not self hosting on Lemmy either, you're trusting your data to a 3rd party. The main difference seems to be that there's much more centralisation on bsky.

I think it's entirely reasonable to be wary of any service, be ready to delete your account if it goes to shit or whatever it is you need to do to feel safe.

But right now, I like blue sky. I've had far more positive interactions on there than I ever had on twitter (even before musk took it over), the lists feature that lets you pre-emptively block entire swathes of dickheads is a game changer (I just block one group, anyone Maga) and I'm having a good time.

I expect I'll get downvoted for this but honestly I don't care, the world has gone to shit far too much for me to give a crap about what internet strangers think over my own health and wellbeing and right now I'm having a good time and will not apologise for it.

The second that stops, I'll be leaving bsky.

[-] 73ms@sopuli.xyz 26 points 6 months ago

You're right that the issue isn't just trusting a third party in general, that's how it is for most users on Lemmy or Mastodon too.

The difference isn’t whether you personally run a server. It’s whether the network depends on a single company.

Bluesky operating basically all of the infrastructure on that network means:

  • they decide moderation policy and what content gets boosted or hidden for everyone
  • they alone can change the rules for access and in general (ads, pay to be seen etc.)
  • they can de-prioritize or cut off third-party infrastructure
  • if the company fails, pivots or is pressured legally (I'm sure the current US government could never do such a thing), the network can effectively collapse

Here on Lemmy there is no single company that has all that power. If your admin goes bad there are real options to move to and the network will still exist even if they shut their service down. You also have much more leverage over here because you have those options and no operator is drawing in tens or hundreds of millions from investors who get to make the decisions.

[-] Scrollone@feddit.it 4 points 6 months ago

I agree. But it's a bit scary even for Lemmy, given that all the most active communities are currently hosted on the same 1 or 2 biggest instances.

Also, see what recently happened to LemmyNSFW...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Retail4068@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's popularity had nothing to do with the protocol and making cries to such does nothing.

Make fediverse competitive client wise, and stop screeching at peoples in the center when they call Gavin progressive 🤷‍♂️. It's not the tech that keeps people away, it's the users.

[-] Chais@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago

The cries are about how Bluesky uses it and implements the required infrastructure, not the protocol itself.

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Agreed. They're both open on the internet and the data is in many repositories. Moot point (OPs', not yours).

[-] 73ms@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 months ago

It obviously matters whether the data and control is mostly in one company's hands, not just whether it is in "many repositories".

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] 73ms@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 months ago

I've run into people like that on Bluesky much more than on the fediverse. They do of course exist on both.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 6 months ago

Why would people here consider Bluesky when Mastodon already exists?

[-] Auth@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Bluesky built the platform that people actually want.

Mainly an algorithmic feed and more relaxed and diverse userbase.

[-] 73ms@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 months ago

They captured some hype but nowadays you often see people complain that the userbase isn't diverse and that all they talk about is US politics, there's lots of dormant accounts and the active user statistics have been looking pretty bleak since early 2025.

Assuming they don't actually have 100M in funding already secured (which i doubt) I think there's some doubt over how long they'll actually be able to continue operating this way.

[-] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

If twitter but with less right wing voices is what the people wanted then they will be sorely disappointed when bluesky enshittifies with no real recourse to prevent it. If everyone just hops on over to blacksky or whatever other 3rd party relay exists, they’ve still got the same problem. All the power resides in a single entity. Bluesky’s basic defense of their platform is that if they enshittify then ATProto allows some other benevolent corporation to take their place but has one major flaw. Corporations are not benevolent

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] statelesz@slrpnk.net 7 points 6 months ago

Network effects.

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 months ago

Adulation of for profit big tech assholes is near ubitious.

[-] rozodru@piefed.world 4 points 6 months ago

you mean the social network whose CEO told users to simply stop posting on their platform when she refused to ban a publicly known racist and transphob from the platform? that social network? The social network whose users decided segregating themselves was the best way to use said platform? that one?

Bluesky is a joke and its userbase are the punchline.

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 months ago

Bluesky is a joke and its userbase are the punchline.

Succinctly said, I love it

[-] timconspicuous@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

Pretty funny to see this here because this blog post seems like written with AI assistance ("it's not just x, it's y", etc.) and also its author advocates for Nostr instead.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

("it's not just x, it's y", etc.)

Keep in mind, the AIs learned from us. So that's a thing in AI responses because humans use that structure. Same with em dashes.

[-] timconspicuous@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

Yes but in this specific case the author owns up to using Claude for "editing" of the blog entries.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Fair enough. I guess I'm just overly sensitive to the broad-strokes assumption that any given thing is an AI "smoking gun" since I'm an em dash user.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2026
119 points (94.7% liked)

Fediverse

43934 readers
207 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS