this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
243 points (99.2% liked)

Traditional Art

7181 readers
11 users here now

This is a community dedicated to showcasing all types of traditional medium art.

Traditional means a physical medium. This includes acrylic, pastel, encaustic, gouache, oil and watercolor paintings; Ink illustrations; Pencil and charcoal sketches; Etchings; Lithographs; Wood prints; pottery; ceramics; metal, Wire and paper sculptures; Tapestry; Weaving; Quilting; Wood carvings, Armor Crafting and more.

It EXCLUDES digital art: anything made with Photoshop, Clip Studio Paint, Krita, Blender, GIMP or other art programs, or AI art.


RULES

1- Do not post Digital or AI art.

2- NSFW content is allowed but it must be tagged.

3 - Extreme NSFW content like gore, graphic imagery, fetishistic works and straight up porn is not allowed.

3- [Change as of 4/12/2026] Posts may be art images, or articles about traditional art. Article posts MUST be tagged [ARTICLE].

4 - The post title should contain the title of the artwork or the name of the artist or ideally both if available. If there is further information about the artwork you want to convey, do it in the body of the post or in the comments.

5 - You can post your own art but keep in mind not to spam. An [OC] tag in the title of your post is recommended.

6 - Avoid extraneous objects and post only the art.

7 - Be civil to other community members.

8 - Keep on the topic of art in the comments. Extreme tangents or arguments will be removed.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Atlusb@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I liked the first book a lot, and wanted to learn them mystery, but I really struggled with the 2nd book. Maybe it is better for me to let it remain mysterious in that nature.

[–] Beryl@jlai.lu 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Clarke only really wrote the 1st book. 2nd, 3rd and 4th were co-written with Gentry Lee and aren't very good. I think the sequels weren't needed and somehow spoil the first book.

[–] Atlusb@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

That's very interesting and I didn't know that. My mind calls out for answers. But also I can see the way it isn't meant to have them. Like its a wider message maybe.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

I read the first book, and the sequels when I was younger. The sequels were a struggle I remember.

[–] radiouser@crazypeople.online 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Great cover for a great book.

[–] MrNobody@quokk.au 4 points 5 months ago (4 children)
[–] pseudo@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] MrNobody@quokk.au 4 points 5 months ago

Oh sorry I meant the thing in the water.

[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 months ago

One of three.

[–] Contentedness 6 points 5 months ago

I read the book over Christmas, there's a cylindrical sea halfway down the length of the vessel and a large island in the sea with a "city" the crew named New York. I'd say that's what that is

[–] KingOfSleep@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 months ago

Kinda looks like it but I'm guessing it's just an island as there were no battleships in the book.

[–] Makhno@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Generation ship. Uses the spinning of the central cylinder to simulate gravity

[–] SamuraiBeandog@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ah I had this one when I was a teenager.

[–] KithWarrior@feddit.online 3 points 5 months ago

Such a great book

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 3 points 5 months ago

You know what this doesn't need?
More humans! (Stupid central intelligence.)

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

So this is where Gundam got its idea...