Every artwork that ai artists put out is full with detail – and intentionally, nonetheless – by a very talented ai artist. You can feel the soul oozing out every second passed when video and every single pixel when images. People who have never seen such high quality might mistake for "slop", but for the initiated, namely ai artists and enjoyers, that's only natural. The strength of human creativity for the spark, and strength of executing/carry-on by the part of the machine. There's some beauty in the union of human and machine itself!

Once looking at ai art, a can't help but think: "How talented. It's as if the artwork itself was talking to the audience. Beautiful."

Compared to ai art, "real" art has no substance. Ai is the real friend of man, not the dog.

Of there will be some critics, trying to appear different and a maybe even a free thinker.

"Don't show love to ai art, it's not real art"

And there's only one fitting answer for any question of that kind:

"Isn't it only natural to complement when it's warranted? The excruciating effort, the skill, the creativity! it all deserves – no, needs – appreciation!

Enjoying is only enough for the poor in spirit when it comes to real art, for it isn't the cheap imitation version that we call humanslop. For that fact alone it deserves infinite appreciation and applause."

Ai art might "just" be a imitation. But there's no physical law that prohibits a copy being better than a original. In fact, there's even a charm in that.

Isn't only natural for a human once having realized the weakness of flesh, to crave the reliability of metal?

Before any mean comments come my way, since I probably made some anti ai feel shame about themselves, remember this:

Ai artists are the most oppressed minority in modern times – closely followed by gamers, of course. So be respectful.