this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
85 points (98.9% liked)

Politics

1248 readers
217 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

Monitor every stock trade Congress and the White House makes

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The National Guard’s top general told Congress on Friday that it would follow the Constitution and the law when he was asked about the possibility President Donald Trump would order troops to polling places for the midterm elections.

The remarks at a U.S. House Appropriations subcommittee hearing came as Democratic lawmakers also voiced unease over the continuing deployment of nearly 2,500 National Guard members in Washington, D.C.

Federal law prohibits the deployment of the military to polling places unless necessary “to repel armed enemies of the United States” and violations are punishable by up to five years in prison.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 19 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Jesus, I'd forgotten that the NG was still in DC. Seems like they're already violating the law. They can't police and there's no "emergency", so what's the justification?

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They are combating the "Enemies of the United States."

Keep in mind, to these facist cult assholes, "Enemies of the United States" are "Anyone who disagrees with us being fascist cult assholes."

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So far the enemies of the United States seem to be litter and low-priority landscaping jobs.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 5 points 3 months ago

Imagine the grandchildren of those guard members regaling the tales of how grandpa spent hard-fought months at war with the dandelions of DC

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago

Yes but I assure you, its COMMUNIST litter.

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 6 points 3 months ago

whats the 'Fuck you lib'

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Technically, DC isn't a "State". It's 100% under Federal Government jurisdiction already, so they can basically do whatever they want there.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No they can't, they just have an easier time federalizing them. Posse Comitatus still applies.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not for DC. The NG can be used for law enforcement there. I think there are some restrictions...but not many.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The executive says they can be used in DC without restriction. That's never been established in law and relies on an interpretation where the NG under the control of the federal government is not federalized. There's currently a court case against the deployment and the stays thus far have not addressed Posse Comitatus though they have allowed them to stay in place.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I guess it's okay that they're not following federal law though? I wish we could believe them.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I am far more worried about whatever the administration is planning on as far as the DHS is concerned. The PATRIOT act has granted them extraordinary powers in relation to fighting 'terrorism' without bothering to strictly define what 'terrorism' is... this administration has shown a gleeful willingness to apply that label to their political opposition.

At least National Guard members actually live in the communities that they would be asked to attack (however the administration may phrase it).

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

At least National Guard members actually live in the communities

That kind of depends on the size of the state. Also, if you look at the 1970 Kent State shootings, the national guard will/can do some shitty stuff if they're under shitty leadership. Just like the military.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 6 points 3 months ago

They'll also very happily deploy troops from red states to police the blue states.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Not true, if Trump federalizes the Guard, they can send whoever pretty much wherever. Now that "guy next door" is a chud from Idaho.

[–] BonkTheAnnoyed@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 months ago

so.... he'll be fired before the midterms then. Who tf thought it was a good idea to ask him that on the record?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Voicing unease? Daaaaaamn.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Can’t trust anything coming out of a soldier unless it’s at an autopsy.

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Vivisection too. Donated organs. Plenty of things.

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 3 points 3 months ago

Oh. Some really good drawings of dicks.

[–] J92@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Seems increasingly like trump is scared of an insurrection that puts him to the gallows within the borders of D.C. Got himself a little buffer zone.