57

I can't find the source code for this, I am posting here to save it to remind myself to search later.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 7 points 3 months ago

Elevator achieves performance on par with or better than QEMU's user-mode JIT emulation.

QEMU is a weird pick here. Why not FEX?

[-] refalo@programming.dev 5 points 3 months ago

Why is it "weird"? It has been around much longer AFAIK.

[-] moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Because fex/box86 have the ability to run arm binaries linked to x86 libraries, netting signficantly greater performance. In addition to other tricks.

https://box86.org/2022/03/box86-box64-vs-qemu-vs-fex-vs-rosetta2/

[-] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 2 points 3 months ago

I think there will be cases that do not work. For example, default memory access semantics of multi-threaded code are different for x86 compared to ARM - the code likely contains assumptions that are not valid on ARM.

[-] ExperimentalGuy@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago

What's the point of this when you can compile between ISAs using a build tool and source? When would you need to cross compile a binary after building?

[-] jdr@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 months ago

Because you don't have the source or because you can't configure the cross-compiler

[-] ExperimentalGuy@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

I guess I'm confused about the context you'd be in that situation.

[-] qaz@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

E.g. when you have a proprietary program that is only available on x86, but you want to run it on ARM.

[-] dev_null@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Most software most people run is closed source and doesn't have an arm version. Isn't this the usual situation? Aunt Flo isn't recompiling her tax filing software for arm. She just runs it, and it works because the arm laptop she has came with this built in.

[-] jdr@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

I'm not talking about closed source software (heaven forfend!) but maybe you don't have network access, or you don't know what version you have or something. Sometimes even the best of us end up with binaries of unknown provenance that still must run.

[-] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 1 points 3 months ago

Easy to explain: The idiot project manager skipped to set up source control, and the sources have been lost.

[-] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

It's for closed source software obviously.

[-] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 1 points 3 months ago

Isn't going all that AI tech going to make automated decompilation trivial? Re-compiling would not need illustrative variable names...

[-] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

That is basically what this does, but more reliably.

this post was submitted on 13 May 2026
57 points (100.0% liked)

Programming

28274 readers
252 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS