this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
247 points (98.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

16441 readers
630 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Anything but trains.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 131 points 3 months ago (4 children)

The American mind is just incapable of comprehending trains

[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 58 points 3 months ago (5 children)

We can comprehend just fine. There's a project, California High Speed Rail, under construction to connect these two cities. The trouble is that our political and economic systems have become so sclerotic that China has built an entire HSR network since work on this line began, and it won't even be done before 2031.

We can still build highways, because the political and regulatory mechanisms to create them were fine-tuned as the system crystalized into inflexibility.

Frankly, this exact inability of U.S. society to change and adapt to new conditions was the signal indicator of the incipient collapse, for me.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If you wanted to build a track for these "high speed buses" it would require special safety features, signalling, barriers etc. that make it look much more like a train track than like a motorway. So you'd gain exactly nothing over building a train track.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not true. Not even close. According to the article, the bus lanes would be built on existing infrastructure. The bridges exist, the right-of-way exists, there would be comparatively little political resistance, the cost would be MUCH lower. Also, maintenance costs would be much lower.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

But those aren't going to do 180 km/h. No existing bus will achieve this kind of speed on a regular motorway. This is all just a bunch of hot air.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 4 points 3 months ago

Well, yes, exactly. A nation cannot remain an economic superpower by frittering away its wealth on expensive, but suboptimal shit like a "highway" for high-speed buses. If it's no longer able able to build effective, cheap infrastructure because it doesn't benefit an entrenched industry, then collapse isn't far off.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There’s a project, California High Speed Rail, under construction to connect these two cities.

Proposition 1A passed in 2008, followed by the awarding of federal stimulus funds in 2010.

The California HSR was a plot point in the second season of True Detective, which began production in January of 2014.

18 years later, the Phase One between San Francisco and Anaheim is still under construction.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's funny because 80% of comments about general "Americans" are also falling for the propaganda

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yakko@feddit.uk 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I comprehend it fine. UK life, no car, train only for going on five years. Cheaper than owning a car, even with the occasional taxi ride. Get more steps in, too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

We've been force-fed this line of bullshit about cars being freedom. Public transportation is for freaks and losers. I mean. GM and Standard Oil say so!

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Have you ever looked at how much the land costs where we would put the trains?

This is more of an unrestrained capitalism thing rather than a distinctly American thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 36 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I thought they ate the onion but somehow this appears to be an actual serious study. I can't imagine how uncomfortable a bus going 140mph would be. At that point the engineering required to keep the road in appropriate shape is likely more expensive than just using rails...

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Once again, the Onion has predicted the news before it happens..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNixDlRoMvA

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Trying to turn I5 into the autobahn with a 140 mph bus lane would result in so much chaos and destruction that honestly I'm all for it.

There is 0 chance that the average American drivers liscense having brain could comprehend this concept.

Most people can't even keep an actually reasonable following distance, or understand the concept of a passing lane.

This is a literally comically stupid idea, its a B movie plot element from an 80s scifi movie.

Fuck it -> Do it for the lols.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is a literally comically stupid idea, its a B movie plot element from an 80s scifi movie.

[–] babysmokesalot@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (4 children)

The reason for busses is simple and seems to be ignored by literally everyone.

The private property between SF and LA keeps increasing in price so the costs for the project are in the billions before anything is even built. The signing of the land is in the billions. Now build a rail in Trump's economy and it becomes nearly impossible to succeed at anything rail.

Busses builds an audience that can be used to later justify rail to get buses off the road. Americans hate big trucks on the road but there they are anyway. It's a slow burn turn to morph the car brain into train brain.

[–] teft@piefed.social 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Weird how cities used eminent domain to bulldoze entire black and Hispanic neighborhoods to build highways yet can’t use eminent domain to get some rich assholes overpriced real estate for this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The private property between SF and LA keeps increasing in price so the costs for the project are in the billions before anything is even built.

Damn, if only eminent domain existed

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AccoSpoot1@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Build a train you fucken cowards

🚂🚃🚃🚃

[–] BozeKnoflook@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Wow, 140MPH! That's ... still 84MPH slower than the fastest trains in Europe, and 127MPH slower than the fastest train in Asia (Shanghai maglev).

These stupid fantasies are still a pale shadow of what the rest of the world has already managed to achieve. Just finish building the fucking train already!

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago

Not to mention that's quite a dangerous speed for a bus

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Hey, if that bus drops below 55, we got a way to deal with that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nbsp@programming.dev 21 points 3 months ago

recycling the classics

Obama Replaces Costly High-Speed Rail Plan With High-Speed Bus Plan

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNixDlRoMvA

[–] Lev@europe.pub 19 points 3 months ago

Everything but rail, huh?

[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhh!!!!

[–] palozano@infosec.pub 13 points 3 months ago

I bet they will do a "special track" for them

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 13 points 3 months ago

There is no amount of traffic that would make me consider getting in a robot-controlled 140 mph bus lmao.

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You can always trust in the US-americans to do the right thing, after having exhausted every other possible option.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Trouble is, every time you think they've hit rock bottom, they'll find a new depth to sink to.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There are already rails between LA and SF. Why not use them?

[–] Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because it takes 8+ hours.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I was being rhetorical. There is infrastructure that can be developed here.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They're currently building high speed rail, but it's 14 years from opening by current estates.

Was supposed to be done by now, it's been a shitshow, but it seems to have improved in recent years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Y'all, they're building a high speed train, but it's mired in problems, and if the economy crashes, it will be decades before it's completed. This would be a medium-term solution that's easy to build, and easy to take down when it's no longer needed.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

These "high speed buses" don't even exist in theory. So it would just be plain old regular buses. You can have these now.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

They should explore eminent domain and build real transit.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But what if there aren't enough minority neighbourhoods to bulldoze?

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The farmland between LA and SF isn't minority neighborhoods. But my comment was more an off the cuff dismissal of this ass-backward bus idea than an actual policy opinion. Here's a real policy opinion: Stop making excuses and run the fuckin trains.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

There you have your problem: That farmland belongs to rich white people.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

We already did that then tore it all out and let the railroads keep the property and money they schemed, scammed and straight up stole.

[–] Finalsolo963@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 months ago

Land isn't an issue for high speed rail in CA (anymore), so... high speed busses with dedicated lanes is extra silly.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I've got one! A people movie treadmill! 300mph. You catch a local taxi, it accelerated to 80mph. Then you jump on to a plane which then takes you from 80 to 300. Then you jump on the treadmill. Don't know yet how to get you off. Bit its not disgusting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bmebenji@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You’re fucking kidding me. Schrodinger’s Onion

https://youtu.be/QNixDlRoMvA

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

So trams are not on their mind ?

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

This bus proposal is basically a 'back to the drawing board' plan. How can you get people to travel between SF and LA faster than driving, and maybe cheaper than flying, especially if jet-fuel prices stay high.

It's going to follow the existing roadways. What the original high-speed rail project could have done, instead of jogging far inland: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Route_of_California_High-Speed_Rail

Given diesel fuel costs, they'll probably end up with EV, perhaps with overhead cabling. And to avoid expensive 'self-driving' buses, maybe they'll put down 'guide lines.' To be able to go faster than cars, they'll have their own lane, or use center divider areas. And to avoid pollution and wear and tear, instead of rubber tires, they'll go with metal wheels. But to prevent damage to the roads, maybe they'll have to swap the guide lines with hard metal, protective lines...

Meanwhile, elsewhere: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-speed_rail_in_China

[–] mellowistheyellow@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Why is American society so braindead?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›