142
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Nearly a quarter of people seeking an abortion in the United States were unable to get one due to bans that took effect after the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision, researchers estimate. In the first half of 2023, states with abortion bans had an average fertility rate that was 2.3% higher than states where abortion was not restricted, according to the analysis – leading to about 32,000 more births than expected.

The findings are based on preliminary births data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The research has not yet been peer-reviewed but experts say the data paints a clear picture about the direct impact of abortion restrictions.

“It’s an assault on reproductive autonomy,” said Alison Gemmill, an assistant professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. She was not involved in the new analysis, but has published research on the effect that a strict abortion law had on births in Texas.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 98 points 2 years ago

Conservatives: all part of the plan

Meanwhile everyone else us wondering what the effect of all those unwanted children will have in the next 30 years for those families.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 46 points 2 years ago

Wait until those conservatives find out that POC are having more kids than white people (in part due to less access to affordable contraception).

[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 32 points 2 years ago

My coworker brought up that point at a party and omfg if I had camera out it would have been a viral meme.

[-] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Then they'll continue to defund social services, wait for those kids to get old enough to commit crimes as poverty often encourages, then they'll collect that fat check from private prison lobbyists. Slavery with extra steps.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 years ago

the effect of all those unwanted children will have in the next 30 years for those families.

Conservatives: also part of the plan

[-] RedditReject@lemmy.world 91 points 2 years ago

We are likely going to see a rise in infant and maternal mortality rates as well. Most of the states that outright banned abortion are also ones where they didn't expand Medicaid and have fewer hospitals

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago

And in 20 years, a spike in crimes.

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 years ago

Which will continue to feed the prison industrial complex. The cycle continues.

[-] scaredoftrumpwinning@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Glad someone mentioned this.

[-] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 17 points 2 years ago

Already have.

[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not to mention all the obgyns fleeing those states. Doctors want to help people, but they don't want to be thrown in jail for life (and they certainty can't help anyone from there). The procedures used for abortion are an integral part of reproductive medicine and save many lives. In these states prosecutors and judges are breathing down doctors necks, second guessing their judgment on when someone is critically ill enough to warrant an abortion. There's already women in those states who know their pregnancy is non viable, know they need an abortion, know that continuing on with the pregnancy will put their lives at risk, but the doctors that still remain have their hands tied to help until they start decompensating when it may already be too late.

Residents being trained in those states are already having trouble getting experience with these important life saving procedures. In some cases programs are trying work around like sending residents to train in other states for a time. But getting a short temporary rotation with just a few procedures is not the same, and surgeries are safer the more repetitions a surgeon has had. Abortion bans are making the entire country less safe, especially so if they get their way and ban it across the entire country and it becomes near impossible to get good training anywhere. Besides all the other obvious implications.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

They are also more likely to have maternity wards close.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

They are also more likely to have maternity wards close.

[-] Leviathan@lemmy.world 65 points 2 years ago

Just fresh slaves for the prison industrial complex. All part of the plan.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 years ago

I think assuming it's just for prison industry is short-sighted. It's also to increase competition for labor so the capitalists can pay the absolute minimum to people begging to work for them. Even if we fix the prison slave labor issue, regular labor is still being exploited, and this is all by design.

[-] Leviathan@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Totally agree. The issues are always complex, thank you for the perspective.

[-] scaredoftrumpwinning@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Working as designed, they probably need military fodder too.

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 2 years ago

I can also make some predictions on the direction the poverty and criminality rates are going to go on those states.

[-] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago

Yup, Ney York crime statistics were a perfect case study for that, i can't remember the name of the documentary

[-] reptar@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I don't know about a documentary but I believe economist Stephen Levitt (sp?) put this theory forward.

[-] Additional_Prune@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

32,000 more unwanted kids. I'm sure they'll have great lives. /s

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago

They can get meat packing jobs after kindergarten.

[-] Something_Complex@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Not to mention we might have a big war comming. You still need cannon meat, and I say why not, their parents where already forced to have them.

Probably condemning them to a shitty lovelless life, might as well finish the job and kill the poor bastards.

Fucking republicans.

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

Gonna need a helluva lot more foster/adoptive parents in a couple years.

[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

We can go to those abortion rights protest with a sign up sheet.

[-] garretble@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I'm pretty sure I've seen a video of someone doing just that and getting zero signatures.

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Good luck getting signatures. There are people who have done this, and they all gave an excuse as to why they can't do it.

Edit: for clarity: The Pro-lifers or Anti-abortionists make excuses as to why they can't take in these kids.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago

Who could have seen this coming /s

this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
142 points (95.5% liked)

News

39069 readers
2328 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS