this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
56 points (75.9% liked)

Privacy

50100 readers
755 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We build free, open-source privacy tools — encrypted chat, anonymous mail, untraceable voice, a whistleblower drop, a browser, a network layer. All given away.

But "free and open source" means nothing if you can't check it. So:

  • Source is public — read every line: github.com/Anon-Gratis
  • Hashes are signed — verify the binary matches what we published
  • Build it yourself — don't want our binary? Compile it from source

We don't want your trust. We want you to not need it. The only privacy tool that survives "trust me bro" is the one you can read.

🌐 anonymous.gratis · ✉️ admin@anon.gratis (PGP on site)

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ag10n@lemmy.world 63 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Hacktivists on GitHub. Show me your forgejo

[–] patruelis@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Haha, perfect!

[–] unitedwithme@lemmy.today 5 points 1 month ago

Dude, right, I'm not great at code, but I won't/don't trust MsHub

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 45 points 1 month ago (2 children)

All these JVM-based packages just appeared out of nowhere three weeks ago and have no almost no git commit history. Your fediverse accounts are weeks to hours old. 🤔

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Good point. The first repo, anon-vpn, has single commit made 3 weeks ago.

Security sensitive software require time, review or audit. Let's give this time. It may take from a few months to 2 years until there's enough scrutiny to either confirm it's safe, or reveal problems.

Until them, keep using well-known open-source software.

[–] helix@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago

Telltale sign of LLM usage.

[–] Steve@communick.news 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So many people conflate privacy with anonymity.
They're largely unrelated.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

I think this would be a relatively straightforward explanation. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Privacy - whether your door's keys are given to someone.

Anonymity - whether or not someone can see what's behind your door.

Security - whether or not your door is locked and has alarms.


Good & Bad practice examples

Good privacy: people can only enter and leave your door with your consent.

Good anonymity: people don't know what's behind your door.

Good security: people can't break in easily, and if they do, you know.


Bad privacy: adversaries can enter and leave your door without your consent.

Bad anonymity: adversaries know what's behind your door.

Bad security: adversaries can break in easily, and if they do, you don't know.

[–] jsnfwlr@lemmy.ml 2 points 12 hours ago

Privacy - only those you allow can see what happens behind the door

Security - only those you allow can open the door

Anonymity - only those you allow know who the door belongs to

Secrecy - only those you allow know the door exists.

[–] Steve@communick.news 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Privacy is about activity.
Anonymity is about identity.
Security is about ensuring the other two.

I would say: Privacy is everyone seeing you come and go from a house with no windows.
Anonymity is when you're covered head to toe when you come and go. So nobody know who lives there.
Security is a measure of how good your locks and coveralls are.

Real world examples: Going to a protest with a mask is anonymous, in public.
Sessions with your court appointed therapist are private, not anonymous.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Anonymity - whether or not someone can see what's behind your door.

that's also privacy. anonimity is whether the neighbors know who lives in your house

[–] portnull@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Privacy is related to activity

Anonymity is related to identity

Security is related to access

[–] Chewt@beehaw.org 36 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Love the message, but personally I won’t use software written by LLMs.

[–] idriss@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

yep, instant skip

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

Where are you taking this info from?

[–] OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Human vetted. So long as it's good sound code. I see no issues. Needs to be human expert vetted.

[–] fubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

Or it could be written by a human to begin with and not have endless subtle bugs that take greater expertise to find and fix than just writing by hand.

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

Um... vas? Maybe I don't get it, but you're just forking and tweaking already open source software? How does this change the model of anything?

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago

We already have all this stuff, stop larping as a 1337 h4x0r and go fix some bugs in your preferred xmpp client or one of those Firefox forks

[–] helix@feddit.org 8 points 1 month ago

Oh no, another AI slop project.

We're really getting drowned in AI stuff aren't we 😒

[–] snowydroopz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

So, is this like what proton shoulda been? Not exactly ik, but is this like a suite?