this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
32 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

4898 readers
416 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 14 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

In a perfect world I'm actually ok with this...the problem is this isn't a perfect world and we all know it's just a trojan horse for age verification as that's the only way to actually implement it.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I disagree. We're all accepting that the modern world exists primarily online, but instead of preparing our children for the online world, we build a walled garden with no access, until the age of 16 where they get unlimited, uninformed access.

The only solution to this problem is parents teaching and directing their children. The state cannot and should not be involved

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

Fair enough, I think in the real world parenting is the best solution. I just don't see an advantage to children being on social media...but I personally think social media is mostly a cesspool and barely use it myself. I just can't approve of something being used as an excuse to push age verification.

[–] Waterpumpee@lemmus.org 13 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

i agree kids shouldnt post on grown ups social media but if there's some kind of service protecting from grooming, bullying etc. then why not? Also how to enforce that shit? Its only a plot to make us give all our data.

Back in the day facebook tried to enforce real names.

[–] john_t@piefed.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think you'll have to give all your data to random websites. You'll be issued a single use token with a yes/no flag saying if you're over 18.

That's it. It's so, so much less data than what people are mindlessly giving to social networksthese days. Contacts, birthdays, private conversations, credit card numbers, personal photos, minute-by-minute IP and geolocation. Those are all things that social networks take for granted and governments don't (and will not) have access to.

People are making a giant fuss about "them gov'nmint" but completely ignore all the data social networks already have. And you can simply not use them if you don't want to give "all your data to government". I know I won't.

[–] lemmysmash@beehaw.org 11 points 4 weeks ago

Don't hide behind kids' backs, call it what it is: identity tracking.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 4 points 3 weeks ago

How is this going to effect the fediverse?

[–] Marija@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

Smart, I am exhausted by what these algorithms do to kids' attention spans. Most importantly, their safety!