this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
318 points (97.9% liked)

politics

30574 readers
2895 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In May, the House Energy and Commerce Committee ‌voted 48-1 in favor of the Sunshine Protection Act. The U.S. Senate voted unanimously in March 2022 to make daylight saving time permanent but the House never took up the measure in the face ​of opposition. The proposal the House will consider next week would allow states ​to opt out.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You know, waking up outside of your circadian rhythm can really fuck with you. So, I propose daylight fairness time. Instead of splitting up timezones by hours, we should split timezones by one (1) minute increments. This allows people to most effectively decide their living location to match their own personal circadian rhythm!

this is basically how time worked before we invented railroads

[–] teolan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How about we don't do that, and instead ensure that workers can chose their starting hours so they match their rhythm?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

JUST! DO! THINGS! AT A! DIFFERENT! TIME! DAMMIT!!!

Head smashing GIF

If you feel like time should always be an hour ahead, just do things an hour early! There's no need to change our entire reckoning of time

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I am very surprised by the push back to this I'm reading in the comments. Keeping time stable will on average, be a 30 minute difference relative to the sun, and folks are fearing they will spend their entire days mired in darkness? I don't get it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

We should all just use UTC. To be honest. It's not like noon has to be at 12'oclock everywhere.

[–] jumjummy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I keep hearing this and can’t believe people are serious with this suggestion. In my mind it’s the most ridiculous solution to time tracking.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 2 weeks ago

They'll pick the wrong one, and we'll have to live with it getting dark at 5 PM for the rest of history.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

So is this making “spring forward” permanent, or “fall back” permanent?

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 7 points 2 weeks ago

spring forward

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I tried to have the conversation of just doing away with time zones all together with my wife once. She could not understand that the number associated with when it gets daylight and when it gets dark is arbitrary. Instead of getting daylight around 6am it would be getting daylight around 10am (if we adopted UTC for example) or gets dark around midnight (12AM). The weird thing is she lived in Alaska far enough north that during the summer it didn’t even really get dark at night. I also wanted to talk about the alternative calendars like the IFC or the Gormanian but I’m pretty sure I would have broken her brain. She’s pretty sharp but apparently abstract thought about concrete things like dates and time are a bridge too far.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›