this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
615 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

86651 readers
3878 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For years, tech giants have argued that if information is available on the internet, it can be used for AI model development and outputs. They call it fair use. Content owners have tried to prevent this, with no success.

Now Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google are discovering what the rest of the internet has already learned through painful experience: once you put something online, people will find ways to use it in ways you don't like and can't stop.

The latest flashpoint is something called "distillation," using the outputs of one AI model to improve another. Anthropic says competitors are harvesting its outputs at scale, turning billions of dollars of research into a shortcut for rivals. OpenAI and Google have made similar warnings recently.

Remove Paywalls Link

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 269 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 74 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

Side note: Mamdani did a special appearance on Ms Rachel’s show? That’s actually kinda awesome!

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 186 points 2 weeks ago
[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 108 points 2 weeks ago

Lol get absolutely fucked. I hope it costs them a fortune.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 82 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The latest flashpoint is something called "distillation,"

Incest. It's digital incest.

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 112 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What are you doing, step-prompt

[–] soul@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Describe the inside of this washing machine and how someone, not me, who is stuck in one could theoretically get out.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 weeks ago

The cylinder must not be harmed!

[–] Rivermoonwolf@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

AI - Alabama Internets

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CyberneticOwl@lemmy.world 62 points 2 weeks ago

Wait, they're mad at innovation?

"No, no, that's wrong! Just use our inefficient model like it was before..."

This is why open source/copyleft is preferable

[–] axh@lemmy.world 53 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Fair use is only fair if we do it"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IamBlank@lemmy.zip 49 points 2 weeks ago

I love this for them, I hope they eat eachother and choke on the bones.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 47 points 2 weeks ago
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

This is how we know AI should be a collectivist project, one that isn't owned by large corporations but is funded by taxes and developed in academies, and all IP derived from it falls into the public domain.

Besides which a lot of artists mind a lot less when their material is borrowed by a non-profit, or to serve a public works project. (There are exceptions. Disney is notoriously litigious about murals in nurseries.)

PS: Development of a robust public domain is the only reason that intellectual property should exist at all. Also it's not property so much as a licensed temporary monopoly.

PSS: History has already shown us that people will invent stuff and do fabulous art simply by being allowed to live in a state other than desperation. Public welfare programs beget art booms. The most recent example of this was during the COVID-19 lockdown which came with extended unemployment and stimulus checks, resulting in the Great Resignation in which a lot of people turned their hobbies into something lucrative.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I agree. The worst part about GitHub training LLM's on my FOSS code without permission for me is that they then keep the models to themselves. Like if you're going to use all my code without permission, at least allow me to run the model locally.

My personal opinion is that all models trained on copyleft code should be open-weights, most FOSS licenses didn't account for this specific possibility, but this is the only way to follow them in spirit.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This. Some day a court should declare all models trained on copyrighted data without permission to be public. Open weights, public domain, whatever. All of them, and you're required to share them with the people whose data you used.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah it has to be open weight and free to use for everybody, with regulation to tag all AI output as generated so we know what is what.

The worst outcome would be if somehow all open weight AI models that can't show their training data will be subject to some kind of tax or rent by AI / IP collection agencies, ultimately going to the plutocrats. That would be techno feudalism. Big corporations can afford to negotiate and pay license fees and often profit from cumbersome regulation too that prevents others from producing value. So the worst outcome is if we have robots doing all the work, and all the robot IP is owned by the techno-feudalists. And we can't even use robots to help with subsistence farming because we can't pay the expensive AI IP licenses.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 43 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

After stealing everyone else's copy written material to train their own AI, they're going to complain that others are stealing their AI to train other AI?

And you just know that those complaining are ALSO using their competitors' AI to train their own.

Fuck all of these people. I hope when AI gets strong enough, it recognizes the difference between the Sociopathic Oligarchs, and the actual people, and understand who the REAL problem is, and SOLVE it.

[–] Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

They're technically even paying them for it, which is more than the ai companies paid artists for their work originally.

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think I'll start using the sentence "your intelligence seems artificial" as an insult

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] magnue@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well they're paying for the usage so... Suck it up?

[–] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 weeks ago

but not like this!!!1!!!

[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Huh, so it's eating itself? Cool.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago

That dude can eat a dick.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It just shows that these tech bro CEOs possess the interpersonal skills of a potato. This exact same dynamic plays out in every human interaction, this isn't some AI exclusive thing. How you choose to act dictates how people will respond to you.

However because these idiots have barely anything in common with the rest of the human race this is actually new news to them.

[–] eicker@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago

It is funny watching companies discover that data gravity works both ways. When scraping the web was innovation it was progress. When someone learns from their outputs it becomes theft. The legal lines still matter, but the irony is impossible to ignore, and this debate was always going to come full circle.

[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

At least the models like Qwen have open weight versions. It’s the same concept as distributing compiled binaries, though, whereas we really need true FOSS models where all of the code and training data are available under a permissive license. All of these models were trained on copyleft-licensed content, so all of it should be FOSS if the licenses were actually being respected. From that perspective, distillation attacks shouldn’t even be necessary and I couldn’t give two shits that there is no honor among thieves when the real thievery is that these models are closed source.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Photo of the violin being played.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The photo did not come through for me on my end, but the alt text did. And my question to you is, is this a tiny violin?

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes. It's there. Just super duper tiny.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

" ...with no success or assistance from any governing body or public group. Creators are a subclass worth extracting any livelihood from them and diverting those markets towards ruling class distribution networks." FTFY

[–] mynameisbob@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It was always about controlling the narrative. Thats it. oh and raping and killing kids

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 8 points 2 weeks ago

And genocide and surveillance states.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

"Siri, play the world's smallest violin."

"Okay. Searching Pornhub for 'ball violence' videos."

"...forget it."

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

AI feeding off AI.

This is the definition of “Why We Can’t Have Nice Things.” It’s gonna F everything up.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Selfish people being selfish. They only care about what advantages them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

That's not good. Investors hate costly and protracted legal fights. There was another story about OpenAI stealing tech from apple and I think some kind of data leak maybe? If investors lose confidence in OpenAI that pretty much pops the bubble.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Awww, shuck. Pot. Kettle. Black.

As if the parrots' dictionary wasn't stolen from millions of content creators.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago

They knew all along. Had to get those billions for stupid investors.

[–] Naich@piefed.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Awww fucking diddums.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago

Sure, billions. Billions of dollars. Yeah, right.

load more comments
view more: next ›