this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
64 points (94.4% liked)

Privacy

50045 readers
1030 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blueworld@piefed.world 41 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He's so full of shit: "The technology is really simple," he told ABC7. "A car drives by, we take a picture. It's a static picture of a car, and then we read the license plate. That's what the technology is -- it's actually not that complicated, it's pretty simple."

When in fact these use AI to build what the company calls a "Vehicle Fingerprint" to identify each car by make, model, color, body type, and distinguishing features like bumper stickers, roof racks, dents, decals, and even objects in truck beds. They can track and identify vehicles even when license plates are missing, obscured, or swapped for an 6-12 frame interaction. Moreover it is a database of metadata allowing them to characterize personality, trends, habits, and patterns across 80,000 cameras in 49 states. That's just the plate readers.

They've grown to include 'first responder' drones, audio sensors, gunshot detection sensors, and full video surveillance in both the public and private sphere.

And worse is it's real-time cross-jurisdictional alerting, which has seen multiple false reports.

So it's damn well not just a static picture of a car, but surveillance capitalism.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The liars are lying again? I'm shocked!

[–] Steve@communick.news 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Stop playing with the electrical outlets and you'll stop being shocked!

[–] f3nyx@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 days ago

LAPD suspending their contract gives me hope that this movement is strong enough.

Protesting, showing up to city council, and generally making officials' lives uncomfortable is the bare minimum, because it works.

[–] silentjohn@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 days ago

"The technology is really simple," he told ABC7. "A car drives by, we take a picture. It's a static picture of a car, and then we read the license plate. That's what the technology is -- it's actually not that complicated, it's pretty simple."

100% lying: https://www.404media.co/flocks-ceo-says-its-alprs-dont-do-video-after-repeatedly-announcing-they-can/

[–] ef9357@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

I don’t care if the technology is simple and I don’t care if it only records license plates, it is inherently wrong.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago

My asshole spoke out against the flock safety ceo speaking out and it said that he can eat shit

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There's nothing inherently wrong with the concept of ANPRs (automatic number plate recognition) as these are called in the rest of the world. It's more of an issue that there is a complete lack of laws surrounding how that data is to be used, and especially when it's controlled by a private company. If there were strict laws limiting the situations where ANPRs could be used, such as requiring a warrant to begin searching for plate numbers and automatically discarding data from non-matching plates, I doubt people would complain as much about these.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 11 points 4 days ago

There absolutely is a lot inherently wrong with them. There's no method that is useful and isn't also a means of mass surveillance.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago

If it's a tech product, they're lying about it's use. Everything is a façade on top of a darker and more sinister reason. Go Luddites!