this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
40 points (95.5% liked)

Selfhosted

61070 readers
1053 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have a family immich instance self-hosted. All pics from my kids devices are auto-uploaded on our instance. This is nice, but also updates a lot of photos and videos of they kidding and joking, ando lot of repeated stuff. Immich only allows that I exclude my own stuff, and it’s really boring have to login with each account to exclude my kids stuff. Is there anyway that I can manage and exclude photos and videos of other users?

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] clifmo@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

I run a separate photoprism service with the master photo library. Immich is the entry point. I have a cron job that rsyncs all photos over to Photoprism's mount point. Since it's a mastering app, it has a lot better keyboard navigation and features for separating our the wheat from the chaff.

[–] zako@piefed.social 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Apart from this partner sharing, do you know of another feature to help managing the photos of the family? For example, my partner and me upload a lot of photos of our son but she can't access my photos neither I hers. We can share one album but we need to manually select the photos we want to share, which are most of them.

[–] gblues@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago

Unfortunately, afaik there isn't. But I enabled the share on my account and my family members account, and I can see their pics and they can see mine. I made the share where my account can see all their photos on my timeline and they can see mine. It's working for me.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Really a long time coming pain point is comfortably sharing between family. I think the new workflows will be the way eventually. I plan on using it to auto add pictures with the recognised faces of family members to a "Family Photos" album as they are uploaded, and allow everything else to stay unshared by default for each user.

[–] _Nemo_@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Long-time immich user here, similar problem. The issue (for now) is that only the owner of the media has write access. With partner sharing, all you can do is read the media (and add them to albums).

What I do for now with "trash media" (e.g. photos of receipts and other stuff that one snaps pics of for practical reasons and then forgets): I add my partner's trash to an album named "please delete". I periodically ask them to go through it and remove anything they want to keep, then have them select and delete everything in that album in batch.

Why this may not be practical for you, OP: you have two "trash producers", so you'd have to keep a "trash" album for each of them (and sort trash media correctly). This is tedious work and error-prone: if you have only one pic in you "trash" album that your account does not own, selecting and deleting everything will fail, sending you on a hunt for the one misclassified picture in a batch of >200...

What immich may do about this in the future, as according to their roadmap: in the past, they were planning to add "more granular permissions controls". Right now, they've renamed that to

User groups: Manage groups of users and share albums with a group

I hope this will include permissions management as well.

Wither way, the feature is likely to come with a greater overhaul of partner sharing. Partner sharing, as of now, is partly "broken" due to past design decisions: you can't

  • write to your partner's files
  • share facial recognition data: each one needs to classify people in their pictures individually (e.g. both need to tag "Uncle Fred" individually in their own accounts)
  • share memories: only pictures owned by you will show up in memories, not your partner's

And before anybody asks: no, there's no ETA...

Soon

[–] cevn@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I am sure you can automate that using api keys.

[–] _Nemo_@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Care to specify what you mean by "that"? It's been a lot.

[–] cevn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Just the 2nd paragraph.

[–] bravesilvernest@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Sounds like a request for immich 😉

I thought you as admin have delete access, you might just have to share the folder in "partners"?

[–] Eldaroth@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hmm theoretically, you could spin up a second Immich and mount the folders in there as external libraries with write permissions 🤔

This is just an idea which came to mind reading your post. But I would assume that messes with the metadata stored in your primary Immich instance or rather its DB. So probably not the best idea in hindsight. Also even easier approach to achieve this would be using a simple imager viewer tool directly on the filesystem 😅

[–] gblues@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

I guess I could do it. But would be nice if immich had such a tool.