this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
183 points (98.4% liked)

politics

30590 readers
2502 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The CDC is truly cooked if they're basing science around trying to prove a negative. That is research methods 101 level shit.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sbbq@lemmy.zip 67 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Studies have also not ruled out dragons living under the surface of the Earth.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago

Studies have not been able to prove that Jesus didn’t come back to earth as subsurface dragon, that is heating the ocean water around Australia, to destroy their coral reefs, to destroy tourism, to punish Australia for aggressive restrictions on firearms, because Jesus loves guns. Studies have also not been able to prove that Jesus doesn’t love guns.

[–] EndOfLine@lemmy.world 47 points 5 days ago (1 children)

But they have failed to show any correlation to even suggest causation.

Say it with me now: "You cannot prove a negative."

[–] davad@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

"Studies have not ruled out the possibility that the moon contains spontaneously generated cheese."

[–] X@piefed.world 27 points 5 days ago

“Studies have not ruled out the possibility that a teapot, too small to be seen by telescopes, orbits the Sun somewhere in space between the Earth and Mars.”

[–] Monument@piefed.world 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Studies have not ruled out the possibility that my penis cures depression.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What about the research about it causing depression?

[–] Monument@piefed.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh, yeah. Loads of evidence.

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sample size too small to be statistically significant…

[–] Monument@piefed.world 2 points 3 days ago

I wish (sometimes). That thing is like a dowsing rod for trouble.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 days ago

Studies haven't ruled out that eating pasta is slowing down global warming

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Studies have not ruled out the possibility that the worm ate his whole brain

[–] jaschen306@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Autism is better than deadtism

[–] cheat700000007@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Depends who

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's even arguably better than measles as measles can lead to permanent deafness and cognitive impairment.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

Studies have not proven that monkeys do not fly out of my butt.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 days ago

One fucking study said there was a link and it was proven fraudulent. Every fucking study since then debunked it. Still, scientists are forced to keep wasting time continuing to debunk it

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

When the CDC said face masks wouldn’t help prevent the spread of COVID they were cooked.

Lots of good still there, but this shit is old.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That was a lousy thing to do. Likely done to keep face masks in stock for first responders, but still lousy.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Well exactly. And they could have just said that, but they went with a ridiculous lie instead.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

It was rather interesting to see how learning that masks were more about protecting others impacted the behavior of your average Karen.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

He simply can't let go.