this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2026
265 points (95.8% liked)

Canada

12187 readers
1001 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

To no one’s surprise, women and girls are disproportionately targeted, making image-based abuse not just a technology issue but a gendered form of violence rooted in misogyny and power. In fact, in Laura Bates’ book “The New Age of Sexism”, she cites research that says that of the 96% of deepfakes that are non-consensual sexually explicit images, 99% of those depict women. In fact, most of the apps, bots and websites that will create deepfake explicit images don’t even work on pictures of men.

Deepfakes can be used to humiliate, silence, intimidate, or punish women for speaking publicly, participating online, or simply existing in digital spaces.

In the UK, women have reported being filmed by men wearing smart glasses while being approached in public spaces, with recordings subsequently uploaded to social media attracting sexualised and other gross comments. Similar “pickup” content has emerged in the US, where men have used smart glasses to record interactions with women in airports, gyms, and other public spaces, often turning those encounters into viral online content.

Last year, an Auckland man used the Ray-Ban Smart Glasses to covertly record a sex worker without her consent while she was naked. The recording was detected only because the woman noticed him activating the device (by touching the side of the glasses). He pleaded guilty to attempting to make an intimate visual recording, but was discharged without conviction - to the dismay of the brothel owner.

This is particularly concerning because wearable devices are designed to blend into everyday life. A child may not recognise that a pair of ordinary-looking sunglasses contains a camera. They may not realise they are being recorded, and will have little ability to control what happens to that image/footage afterwards.

Consent becomes much harder to meaningfully give or refuse when recording devices are hidden inside objects that look completely ordinary.

Too often, we're told that women and girls should simply be more careful, more alert, and more aware of their surroundings, remain vigilant, and constantly assess whether they are being recorded, instead of placing responsibility on those who design, deploy, and profit from technologies with foreseeable risks of misuse. The same is true for children and young people, who should not need levels of technological awareness beyond their developmental capacity simply to protect themselves from covert recording.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ryan213@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think we should all yell out "Pervert" at anyone we see wearing them in public.

[–] danciestlobster@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Careful they might be into that

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (15 children)

So? You can turn ecstasy into torture, all it takes is conditioning.

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What exactly do you think I whooshed at?

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"they might be into that" is clearly a joke about perverts who already like that "torture", there's no re-conditioning for that and even if there was, it's obviously not to be taken seriously

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It was fun while these were just used for sports and actually interesting outdoor activities, it serves me really well while cycling and snowboarding. I gave away the original wayfarer version so my family can experiment with it for accessibility and now I have just the sports version, which hopefully it's too dorky for these pick-up-artist idiots to start popularizing.

Guess I'll have to go back to a go pro in my helmets like a Teletubby… and find a decent combination of open ear headphones and a microphone that works against the wind. sigh maybe if they made a camera-less version that would solve most of it

[–] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I used stuff like that for hands free tourist recordings. I never did anything inappropriate with them. Unless you count the time a cop glared at me for looking at them with a suspect cuffed to a bench...

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah that's a good use case too — though I do remember seeing folks use it to take pictures of things you weren't supposed to (like temples interiors).

The "covert recording" aspect of it is a big problem, but from the privacy standpoint I honestly think this is less worse than walking around with an Insta360 that is literally recording everything. At least for now the Insta360 is less problematic because it's so bulky that it's not as useful for perverts; but in terms of filming a bunch of people out and about without consent it's worse.

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 10 points 1 day ago

Watch these creeps wearing garbage glasses make life so much harder for the folks with low vision.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I think a good way to combat this, and it should be done now, would be to convince pretty young girls to pull out their phones and record any glasshole they see, while belittling them. Post that shit on TikTok, and laugh. They'll be in public areas, wherever crowds of young people gather.

If we wait too long, and let these become more commonplace the initiative will be lost.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

Back in 2016 I bought several 'dumb' camera sunglasses. Why? I was going to a spy themed nerd convention and I thought having those would fit the theme. I did use some myself when I went on vacation and used them a POV camera and hands free recording of the places and things I wanted recorded.

They were air-gapped. No Bluetooth or WiFi capability. You had to plug them in to get your stuff out. No cloud storage either. You put in a microSD card.

So I do believe they can have utility... But not in the way these people are using it. Not in the 'always on always listening and always on the cloud' bullshit.

[–] BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As somebody who has been falsely arrested, I would have loved these to prove it. But I get it's a privacy issue...

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

More negatives than positives.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)

For the time being and for quite a while, they'll have thick frames. Computers, batteries, speakers, and cameras aren't going to be affordably microscopic anytime soon.

If we start calling out anyone with thick frame glasses, soon people will stop wearing them, unless they're pervert glasses. In a year or two virtually all thick frame glasses will be pervert glasses. They won't be able to hide.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Uhh, designer here. My thick-framed glasses are part of the uniform… ☹️

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

So anyone who wears thick framed glasses in general gets attacked by the mob...great fucking solution.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

“For the time being”… that phrase does a lot of heavy lifting and doesn’t address to core of rhe issue. What happens when it’s small enough it can’t be obviously seen. Maybe it becomes a contact lens, maybe it can fit on a thin bridge on the nose. The problem still remains to be addressed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›