this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2026
233 points (99.2% liked)

politics

30574 readers
2946 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago

This should be arrests of ICE.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe everyone should come to the polls armed.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Oh boy if Federal officers start yanking people out of voting booths or intercepting people on their way to vote on election day we are going to have a fucking shit show.

[–] grumpusbumpus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Who? Who do you imagine is going to do shit?

Nobody's done anything. We have an endless war. We have a personal Nazi army with more funding than the Marine Corps. They've already killed citizens in the street, on camera, with no consequences. Nobody I know has ever expressed a willingness to do anything more than vote, and maybe attend a local, peaceful, pointless protest, if it won't inconvenience their Saturday plans.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] khepri@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If they're smart (ha) then they'll just generate a bunch of buzz and fear about how ICE might be out and about on election day, so that as many people as possible from vulnerable populations (aka non-male non-white people) are too scared for their lives and freedom to go vote.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They will do that for sure, in fact, this very story might be one of the first broadside in that battle. They will also arrest a few. Violently. Any non-white, likely democratic voters, will think twice before they go to the polls.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

ICE will be doing its best to provoke an "active public safety threat" wherever it can during the elections. They'll turn up and start grabbing people out of voting lines, or just threatening people, and as soon as anyone protests it will be an active public safety threat. Then they'll either shut the polling venue down or cause so much trouble outside that no one dare approach. Once the election is done and there just happened to be active public safety threats in Democratic-leaning areas only, the Democrats will decide they have to play by the rules and accept the result in order to protect democracy.

[–] massacre@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

I mean - they'll be using their own burner phones to call in active bomb threats for the buildings they are posted to when a lot of brown people come in. Bit of the old tail wagging the dog...

[–] themaninblack@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is a really fascinating scenario. As far as I know, we’ve never had an election re-do. I wonder what in heck could trigger one

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is no mechanism for it. Short of universal action, this would not happen. The sham election results would stand.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So then we're at secession, I guess.

[–] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Early Voting in Texas starts on October 19th and continues through October 30th. These counties are enrolled in the County-Wide Voting Program. You can get all the information about voting in Texas Here

Vote early, you have 12 days to get up and vote. The lines are short, there is no reason you can't find the time between 7am and 7pm to wait 15 minutes in line and vote on one of those 12 days.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Pedolf Shitler repeating his favorite part of history once more.

Bruh, I’m sick of history being repeated in the worst ways possible

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Okay I hadn't heard that before; I lol'd in the traditional meaning

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Woah an IRL lol?

[–] HootinNHollerin@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Militias are needed to defend

[–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Panther patrols at every polling place. But it won't help, because not nearly enough of the country is willing to actually fight against the things they say they consider unacceptable.

So when they see the first panther patrols being gunned down or arrested en masse, they'll convince themselves it's for the best and do nothing at all instead of arming up to go out and take their places.

And if that's the case, then a fascist dictatorship is 100% exactly what we deserve.

[–] grumpusbumpus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Which won't happen, but would be exactly the provocation the fascists are looking for to declare total martial law and do away with the election.