this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
84 points (89.6% liked)

Technology

43001 readers
372 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] leanleft@lemmy.ml 3 points 28 minutes ago* (last edited 27 minutes ago)

according to performance on standard benchmark. somewhat covered by the controversy surrounding the term: benchmaxing.
if you see all benefit as a linear one dimensional height on a bar graph..
its almost like you assume that the previous model gave the same exact answer(same style) and the new mode gave the same exact answer PLUS additional useful information.
it might be convenient if measuring progress was so simple. but unfortunately/fortunately , it is not so simple . the most important benchmark are the comparison of outcomes on the problems that YOU have & prompts that YOU can(will) write. nothing else matters for YOU.

  • i admit benchmarks are well designed to objectively measure competence on challenging problems that require skill and really need only ONE correct answer.
[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 2 points 29 minutes ago

This seems like a great time to mention what I built and hosted months ago. https://masland.tech/ai-efficiency-index/

The AI Efficiency Index tracks the cost/intelligence mix. Low intelligence is useless. Capability scales exponentially. Expensive ≠ better value. MiMo-V2.5 is the leader.

If you have any questions feel free to ask. This uses the Artificial Analysis leaderboard. They have "cost per task" which I think is weird.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Those models are for general use. If you have business use case and data related to it you can finetune model for specific use that will outperform all of frontier models and run at fraction of cost.

[–] Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

How can you run a local model for better coding support than fable/opus?

[–] vane@lemmy.world 2 points 38 minutes ago* (last edited 36 minutes ago)

You can't right now because there is no dataset available for fine tuning. I'm just saying that it's possible to fine tune 8B-35B parameter model in int4 that will outperform those models ex. for single programming language and developer specific problems. You can read example of fine tuned 8B model here https://fermisense.com/when-machines-take-the-wheel/

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 hours ago

that's the other huge advantage of open models you can run locally

[–] yuman@programming.dev 6 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

what kinda hardware do you need to "run this on your desktop"?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You need a GPU with around 16gb vram at a minimum to run qunatized version.

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I run Qwen 3.6 27B quantized down to Q4_K_M or even a variant Q5_K_S on my 8gb VRAM entry level AMD GPU, with support of my CPU and 32gb system RAM. Yes, I also limit the Context Length heavily to something like 18k. It's slow. But the point is, you don't need necessarily 16gb VRAM.

But it's better to use faster models for this type of hardware anyway. The MoE type of models (such as 26B A4B, or 35B A3B) are vastly, vastly faster for normal usage, but they are a bit worse in some cases. Also Googles QAT trained model versions also have less RAM requirements without losing much quality.

I'm just saying that, so others are not discouraged too much. It's not the same experience as the full version off course, but you can use them with some tricks on weak hardware too.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago

I'm fairly optimistic that people will figure out how to optimize the models a lot further going forward. One obvious path is to try and separate the reasoning network from the trivia that gets baked into the model, and some work is being done in this area. If you could have a context free reasoning engine and then feed the facts it needs to know on the fly based on the context you're running it in, then you could likely have a much smaller model that's very capable.

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You can run it on systems with as little as 32 GBs of RAM.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You don't want to run these models in RAM. I started using them on an RTX 3060-12Gb VRAM, and quickly added another, for 24Gb RAM. I also have 64 Gb RAM. Now it works well. Not lightning fast, but quite useable. VRAM is the key.

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Sure, but with a model of that size you are unloading layers in any case. I'm just saying you need 32 GBs of RAM at the minimum to be able to run it.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Ok, but all of them are far too inefficient for what they deliver.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Ok, but that's a completely nonsensical statement. If you ever used Qwen in an agentic loop, you'd know that it delivers working code, and it takes about same resources as playing a modern game, and I don't see anybody whinging that game are too inefficient for what they deliver.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Sure they are. Especially with moores law dead. And especially since 2020; the more million dollars behind it, the more they run like one from a inexperienced single-dev on itch.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 hours ago

Not sure what Moore's law has to do with anything here to be honest. The models you can run locally on a consumer desktop can do real work, and their resource usage is no different from any other software like games that you'd run.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 51 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Which one of them made these overlapping bar labels?

[–] MXC48@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 1 points 5 hours ago

Probably alibaba with Qwen

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 15 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Hey, a lot of people sucked making matplotlib plots before LLMs existed.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 20 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (4 children)

It’s a bit misleading.

Qwen 27B has way less “world knowledge” than GPT-5. Ask it random trivia without internet search access, and GPT would know waaay more.

This is generally true of small vs large models.

…But honestly, Qwen 27B is better at tool use or agentic stuff. It’s hyper optimized for just that and coding assistance, basically.

This is often true of old vs new. Most newer models have hyper focused on agents/coding, often to the detriment of other use cases.


Quantization for practically running Qwen 27B also has an impact. A off-the-shelf Q4_K_M is not the same as the unquantized weights in real-world use, or even an “optimized” quantization like a custom exl3.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 hours ago

If you run it with RAG (retrieval augmented generation), where the model includes web search, you get pretty decent results. I often include the phrase "search the web extensively for up to date information" in my prompts.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 14 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I mean baking knowledge into a model isn't really all that useful to begin with. Just download wikipedia locally and have it access it through tool use, it's way more efficient and more accurate. And yeah, I find Q6 tends to be the sweet spot where it's close enough to full 16 bit in performance, but doesn't chew up too much memory.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

This is a pretty good idea I hadn't thought about. The whole wikipedia is about 37Gb.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 hours ago

yeah, it's not a completely insane amount of data, and a db like postgres can do fast text search on that too with fuzzy matching

[–] stuner@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

What version do you use and how do you run Qwen3.6? I've played around a bit with the Q4 version in LM studio +Zed, but I was not happy with the results. It looses track very often and often enters infinite loops or just stops...

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I use an exl3, with 4 bit MLPs but higher bit depth attention layers. And I force some custom sampling so I can lower the temperature a bit while keeping it out of loops.

This won’t work in LM Studio though. You have to run such a thing in TabbyAPI or some other backend that supports exllamav3.

[–] stuner@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Ok, thanks! Thaf sounds quite advanced, but I'll have a read afterwards :)

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 11 hours ago

I sort of get it because of you know you're only using the model when you have Internet and want it to search then just let it.

[–] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Kimi is better. Waiting for it to appear on Ollama Cloud.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago

The difference is that you can run Qwen completely local though.

[–] LiamTheBox@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 hours ago

So which one tried to cheat its way into the test?

Llama is one for sure

[–] dparticiple@sh.itjust.works 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 9 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

This is for qwen 3.5, not 3.6, but the vram requirements are a little out there for most:

https://willitrunai.com/blog/qwen-3-5-27b-vram-requirements

16 to 55GB...

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I bought two RTX 3060 with 12 Gb each for a total of 24Gb VRAM. Sionce the cards are not top shelf anymore for gaming, they can be had used in the 200€ range, so my setup was 400€ over the cost of my existing PC. My PC, while not last gen was already pretty beefy, with a Ryzen 9 and 64 Gb RAM. I think 400€ to have a pretty good local AI setup is not bad at all.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I very much regret getting a 3070, with only 8GB of ram... Only reason I am hesitant about 3060s is that dual cards will use more power, and the economics are already pretty dicey when the hosted models are being sold below cost.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I learnt a few years back that the most important driver in GPU. or any other non upgradable memory device obsolescence, is RAM. I got a banger of a deal a few years on a RX 480, but it was 4Gb, adequate at the time. The card was obsolete way faster than the 8GB. As for the power draw, are you planning to have your AI setup running 24/7? Nvtop (linux GPU monitoring app) reports 50-80% of the cards top power draw. There is also the fact that my data doesn't leave my setup.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 1 points 5 hours ago

At the time, it wasn't clear that VRAM beyond 8GB was beneficial. Most cards at the time had basically capped at 8 for ages, and I wanted performance for ray tracing. In hindsight it was a bad call, but for gaming it made sense.

Not 24/7, I'd just start my PC when I need it, but its still more power than I'd like.

Keeping data local does make sense, which is why I have been toying with it. I can run relatively stepped on gemma4 models in 8GB, so for now, I'm happy, but im definitely looking at a Nvidia P40 as a second card.

[–] stuner@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I can run both the 27B and 35B version of Qwen3.6 on my 10GB VRAM 3080, and they run ok. You don't need to put the entire model in VRAM, even if it's probably beneficial.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Full quantisation? I've only got a 8GB 3070, but I'll give it a go

Edit: Tried the unsloth/qwen3.6 with llama.CPP, and it failed to allocate a 26GB Vulcan buffer and died. Dunno what magic your using, no luck for me though :(

[–] stuner@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I run it using LM Studio, which defaults to Q4 quantization, I think. I was able to put about 10 layers on the GPU with 64k token context. That put me at about 9.1 GB VRAM usage, leaving some room for Video playback xD

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 2 points 3 hours ago

I'll give LM studio a go, thanks.

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 5 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I mean that's high but not unreasonable, especially with unified ram machines

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 1 points 17 hours ago

Little outside my budget personally, but I've definitely been itching to pull the trigger on a nVidia P40