Abandonment is the only legal mechanism in Colorado [law] that creates an avenue for residents of the area to receive clean water.
For some reason this feels distinctly American.
this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
195 points (100.0% liked)
News
38802 readers
1712 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I think it's Federal Law now to be this way. laws that make this shit happen tend to be enacted during Republican controlled times... it's a pattern.
Republicans break shit and blame everyone else. Democrats fix shit while assigning no blame. Republicans repeal all of the Democrat policies and then reinstate them with a lot more corruption (and take all the credit) while declaring Democrat policies to be evil. rinse repeat.
I think this was poorly explained in the article, their other legal mechanism would be to elect a functioning city government. In the absence of this, they can legally declare the city abandoned so that they are administered directly by the county (regional) government.
As long as the city exists, the city is typically responsible for utilities within the city limits. The city government is responsible for requesting aid and coordinating repairs to the water infrastructure. There seem to be some sort of local politics issue where they are unwilling to elect local officials to do this, may be people on the other side who want the city to be declared abandoned. By abandoning the city they can appeal directly to the county government to help repair the water system.
Does wherever you live not have unincorporated areas? Places with no functioning town/ village government, so they are administered by the bbezr level of government, county in this case?
I was thinking it sounded more Chinese. Their own government admits less than 25% of the ground water and lakes are drinkable. Which is saying a lot because they're still trying to say they only had 60,000 covid deaths, which is estimated to be closer to 1 to 1.5 million.
So if THEY'RE saying it's sub 25%, it's probably even worse.
Colorado’s Denver Post newspaper described the administrative failure of Hartman as having “no analog in recent state history”.
It will have many analogs in future state history. In other states, as well. Thank you, corporations and politicians! This is what we have to look forward to!
Resident Shawna Casey said: “Hartman is not a failed town. Hartman is a town that was failed by the systems designed to protect it.”
Years not fixing water to the point where it was unusable, sub 100 population and apparently not growing, all admin staff quit amid fistfights and arguments over fraud and the like. Homegirl is snorting dangerous amounts of copium.
Developers can throw up a subdivision in a few months that holds well more than 100 people, so the mechanism to fix the water system was always there, there just wasn't a tax base to pay for it, and apparently no will to take corrective action to fix the systemic issues.
Every state has a federal grant program to fund water system improvements like this (Drinking Water State Revolving Fund). Had their state program considered a project here? Did the regional health department never get involved in a treatment plan? This was a failure on multiple levels.
Yes and the funding was blocked by, you guessed it, Trump.
Earlier this year, Trump vetoed legislation that would have funded a major drinking water project in Boebert’s Colorado district.
The proposal had already passed both the House and Senate unanimously and would have helped provide clean drinking water access to roughly 50,000 residents in the region.
Despite Trump citing financial concerns for vetoing the bill, Boebert publicly argued at the time that the president had previously supported the project before tensions escalated surrounding Peters’ imprisonment and political disputes in Colorado.
That's a special earmark project, and yeah we can definitely lay the blame on Trump there.
But there are ongoing programs in every state that could also handle this. Funding has been massively reduced this year, but the program is still active. And since it's a 'revolving loan fund' that means that each state manages a pool of money they loan out for these infrastructure projects, and the interest collected helps fund more projects. The grant money the EPA sends to the states has been slashed two years in a row, meaning that we can't send out principal forgiveness nearly as much, so localities that can't pass the credit check won't be able to use the program.
So yeah, this is likely what happened to Hartman, CO. Very likely this problem could have been addressed/alleviated years ago, but the discussion of fraud is also a huge factor. So like I said, failure on multiple levels.
Water wars will be starting soon!
Gas town, Bullet town, and the new Datacenter town.
Shady sands, Megaton, diamond city, what are they to do?
Buy water from the hub, rivet city, and some kid with a purifier.
That was a wild mini-rabbit hole I went down reading about this tiny town. Between a revolving door for politicians, an actual fistfight, DOLA showing up over 30 times attempting to straighten things out, and embezzlement on a massive scale.. What a shit hole. I feel bad for the residents.
Now that the town is "abandoned" the county can take it over in order for it to be someone else's problem! Meanwhile the taxpayers will be paying the bill as usual.
So sad to see a town go out like this.
They probably could have learned about collecting rain water. A lot of infrastructure could have probably been created to make that easier and more sustainable. Sounds like a lack of organization and leadership.
Sadly Colorado like many states has a strict ban on collecting rainwater especially during droughts.
that ban sure does backfire a fuck ton... as in every time there is a drought or major water pollution crisis.
Actually you can have two rain collection barrels
https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/hb16-1005
Although legally it can't be used for drinking, only for gardening
which doesn't help at all. and you can't use those barrels during droughts... even for gardening.
it's one of those stupid laws where state wise you can do it but federal law says you can't do it. and federal trumps state especially when Trump is in charge.
The concern about collecting rain water in Colorado is that if enough people did it there'd be nothing to flow downhill to feed all the towns with drinking water and power from dams. This, of course, happened all on its own anyway.
There're a whole bunch of things going on here not the least of which is that if all the dice roll the wrong way, the stars go exactly wrong, the law created a circumstance where you're legally expected to stand outside in a rainstorm with a cup in hand and die of dehydration. That's my weak understanding of it.
Federal laws always overrule local law. It's the entirety of the Supremecy Clause in the constitution
Way older than Trump's presidency
so if a state says that raping kids is illegal but the federal government says that raping kids is perfectly legal... you would support legally raping kids because federal law Trumps local Law.
great. glad to know I wasn't wrong in thinking that you were a piece of shit.
Wtf, no that's not even close to what I said
False. Residents are explicitly allowed to collect rainwater. You can collect and keep 110 gallons, but it can only legally be used for non-potable purposes.
Does that apply to municipalities or individuals. The town may have been able to do it