this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
156 points (100.0% liked)

Games

49910 readers
1057 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Tariffs: paid by the citizens

Refunds: paid by the government (with the citizens' money)

Make it make sense

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 1 points 46 minutes ago

This is a tricky one, though, isn't it?

The end price of the console is ultimately set by the retailer. The retailer will typically make that price higher than they got it from the manufacturer. Some of that cost was paid by the retailer as tariffs, maybe some extra manufacturing costs were higher because of tariffs.

Who is getting the refund? A Japanese company? Or the Americans who had to pay tariffs? Either way, Sony don't sell directly to the consumer, so the retailers would have to be gifted a refund by Sony, and then choose to trace and refund their customers.

I'm I completely wrong about this? How should this work?

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 1 points 48 minutes ago

Sony can't get a cut if it's a used physical disc., which is why they're moving to digital only.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 49 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Since they passed that cost to the consumer, they should be legally required to play it back to the consumers. A refund on a tariff that the consumer had to pay should not be legally pocketable by the business, that should be legally considered theft or robbery.

It is not the fault of the business, but if they incur more operating costs refunding the money they overcharged on the consumer, then they need to sue the government to be reimbursed for that.

[–] Mister_Feeny@fedia.io 26 points 4 hours ago

They'll just follow suit with Nintendo, who are already being sued for this, with their defense being, "the customers got what they paid for."

[–] blackbeans@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Let me play the devil's advocate.

The question is, how do you legally know that they passed all that cost on to the customers? After all, customers did not pay the import fees directly. It will be a hard case to make.

Also, a majority of Americans voted to introduce tariffs. It was a big part of Trump's campaign from the start. The reason Sony received this money in the first place was because of errors made by the American government, making the tariffs illegal. It was the US government that is responsible for this money, not Sony.

[–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

All the prices went up.

Also, 77m voted for Trump which is 32% of the voting age population.

As a percentage of the overall population it is ~23%.

That's not a majority.

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago

Please stop using that logic. The people that voted is a representative sample of the population, done. Is you'd forced every one of voting she to vote then it probably would have been similar result. Because people that didn't want to go both will have their vote split randomly to candidates.

Honestly given these two choices, not voting means you're ok with either.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

People who can vote and do not could just as easily have been lazy Trump voters as anything else. They're political dark matter. They don't absolve a populace.

"Of the people who didn't bother to make a choice at all, maybe most of those didn't want this" is not a compelling argument.

[–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The person above me said a majority voted for it and I corrected them. I'm not sure what relevance your comment has to our exchange.

“Of the people who didn’t bother to make a choice at all, maybe most of those didn’t want this” is not a compelling argument.

It's just as well I didn't make that argument then. I don't appreciate being strawmanned.

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

PS5 lifetime shipments reached approximately 95.3 million units on a sell-in basis — meaning shipped to retailers, not necessarily activated in consumers’ living rooms. That’s genuinely impressive territory, approaching Nintendo Switch numbers.

If by approaching Nintendo switch numbers you mean 60 million units behind the switch lol