this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2026
83 points (97.7% liked)

politics

30930 readers
2421 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grue@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's just an insult to Jimmy Carter.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Who, it turns out, was a fabulous person, most deserving of the Presidency. It was the bureaucracy that failed us, not Carter.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

And Reagan committing treason.

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 weeks ago

One of many such occasions

Yeah but that fucked everybody.

[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Completely his fault. He signed a peace deal that gave them everything, then forced his way out of it. He should have held out for better conditions or stuck with the deal he’d signed. What a disgrace.

[–] Kay_dee1978@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Or...you know...maybe not get into a war in the first place...

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How was he supposed to distract from all the other awful shit about him in the news cycle if he didn’t!?

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Coulda killed himself. I think that would work.

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

I mean the global celebration would certainly be disruptive but I’m more than happy to make that sacrifice

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

That would stick it to the libs. Otherwise he will very likely spend a lot of time on trial in courtrooms eventually.

[–] kevinrns@mstdn.social 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

@return2ozma

They say its an irony that Trump.s "held hostage" by his bombing of Iran.

The itchy creepy irony is even worse.

Because the Republicans got the Ayatollahs to keep the American hostages held by promising money and weapons to Iran.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/03/lawmaker-admits-1980-gop-plot-to-prolong-iran-hostage-crisis.html

#iran #war #trump #chump #Carter

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don’t want to see this drag on for two more years, but I wouldn’t e surprised if his successor could reach an agreement quickly once assuming office. Trump will bad mouth such a deal. “We had them on the ropes, folks, then ___ came in and gave it all away. What are you gonna do?”

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

That would completely match his pattern. Of course it's all lies, he is the self-proclaimed President of Peace and said he would end the Ukraine war before he even got into office.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I hoped the article would explain the context, but it didn't (or I didn't find it). Why is Trump about to become Jimmy Carter? What did Jimmy Carter do that is analogous to the situation that Trump may find himself in?

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Are you asking for a friend? /s