I can't take this article seriously since it confuses debt and deficit. That's an egregious error in the context of saying deficits are over 100% of GDP. That's literally impossible.
It also completely ignored the $19+ trillion in commercial bank deposits nor explained how $19 trillion can be deposited with only $2½ trillion dollars. Or the total size of $29+ trillion in federal money market and bond instruments that are largely cash equivalent. The scale of those is rather critical to contextualizing the scale of USD-backed global financial systems.
Not sure if this was overuse of AI or an ill-informed author, but, either way, it erodes their credibility to the point I stopped reading. If I caught those errors in the easy stuff, then I don't want to read other errors that I might not identify in the more technical argument the author was leading into.