Sad thing is that Ukraine wouldn't have gotten nearly as much support if it looked like they had no chance of winning, or at least resisting.
I think the diplomatic logic is what's the point in supporting a loser - your support doesn't change anything and when they lose you're on the winners shit list. If you support a winner then you may have a beneficial relationship in the future.
❌️ "Violence is morally bad"
❌️ "Violence is morally good"
✅️ "Morality isn't real and violence simply Is."
Doesn't really work like that. Russians are not less white than Ukrainians but their ultranationalist ideas are not nearly as supported in the West.
(Not saying Russian ultranationalism is better in any regard)
Violence is not the answer. Violence is the question. The answer is "Yes"
just gonna post the same comment I made last time this was posted:
the lemmyworlds and their orbiters are gonna be upset about this one
Can't forget the sjw users
Did you open a history book in your life? Violence is always the answer
You can identify the liberals in this thread because they dislike this, but can’t provide a single credible argument against it.
