Just throw 200kUSD in tokens and 60 agents at it for 2 weeks and you'll be done!
Well, add 3 months of bug fixing and a rushed release then everything will be fine. Promise. 😘
Oh, this isn't a post about bun? Sorry.
Just throw 200kUSD in tokens and 60 agents at it for 2 weeks and you'll be done!
Well, add 3 months of bug fixing and a rushed release then everything will be fine. Promise. 😘
Oh, this isn't a post about bun? Sorry.
That sounds like an all in one solution. Only for the cheap price of a Phd.
Would you like to get a licence change on top?
Wow! What an observant smart thought.
Well, except for the fact that code conversion doesn't give you the permission to change licenses or remove copyright. And the small matter of fact that both projects mentioned are Canonical projects, where whatever code that is not directly copyrighted by Canonical, is contributed by someone who signed an agreement with this stipulation:
(b) To the maximum extent permitted by the relevant law, You grant to Us a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, transferable, royalty-free, irrevocable licence under the Copyright covering the Contribution, with the right to sublicense such rights through multiple tiers of sublicensees, to reproduce, modify, display, perform and distribute the Contribution as part of the Material; provided that this license is conditioned upon compliance with Section 2.3.
"Us" being Canonical of course. So they could actually "re-license" the projects right now, without changing a single line of code.
It's always astonishing how condiment in their ignorance people are when it comes to these matters.
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP