this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2026
12 points (100.0% liked)

US news - Lemmy World

70 readers
421 users here now

A community for US news.
Lots of content coming - Like and subscribe!

Rules:

For global worldnews go here: !world_news@lemmy.world

Why create new news community? I'm tired of getting banned by crazy lemmy moderators under made up reasons for posting news articles (likely reddit subversive operation).
Also most of news communities are empty - this one will be full of content.
So i'm now creating my own community. everyone welcome, let's tear reddit down together.

founded 2 weeks ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] llamatron@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are these the tarrifs that a court recently said were illegal?

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Different tariffs. But, yes...even if these do get implemented, they will eventually get thrown out in court for the same reason. He simply doesn't have the authority to do this. Only Congress does.

[–] llamatron@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You say he doesn't have authority but much like everything else he does no one is stopping him. And when someone does intervene it's half-assed and too late.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They actually are stopping him more often than they aren't. It just takes time to go through the court process, and most of the media coverage fades away by the time the case is resolved. But, all things considered, his losses far outweigh his victories.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It doesn't matter because the damage is done and he doesn't pay for the court costs.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It absolutely does matter. That's like saying stopping a murderer from killing more people doesn't matter, because they've already killed someone.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What I'm referring to is a court system that finds a crime and only responds with a judgement, "The Supreme Court has determined that this crime is illegal." That's it. No arrests. No jail time. No fine. Not even, "Don't do it again."

stopping a murderer from killing more people

Trumps new tariffs, when his previous tariffs were already shown to be illegal is proof that they didn't stop anything.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

That would require these actions to be included in Title 18 of the US Code.

Meaning, there would need to be specific legislation written to describe both the crime and the punishment. This would require an act of Congress to correct, so if you want to see this happen, you'd better elect the right people to represent you in Washington...or at the very least, write or call the ones you currently have, and push them to make this a priority.

Most of what Trump is doing are not criminal violations and so have no direct punishment attached to them. They are simply "not legally allowed" under the conditions outlined by the Constitution.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

cool, massively raising taxes on items individuals and companies need. Brilliant strategy

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

What if they don't want to be treated as a US state?

[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The Art of the Deal: 🖕