Now we know why despite having a full team of very highly-compensated attorneys, Maxwell filed her magnum opus appeal pro se (representing herself): it was so she could fling as much horseshit as she liked at the court without having to worry about little concerns like factuality or keeping a law license. Judge shot it down anyway.
This is hilarious. I'm still reading it, but here's a fat paragraph from the introduction by the judge (page 2, emphasis mine):
Maxwell’s claims are all meritless and all or almost all are frivolous. The vast majority are procedurally barred — either because Maxwell made and lost the same arguments on direct appeal, or because she could have made such arguments on appeal but elected not to do so. And the purported “new” evidence to which Maxwell points, principally materials released under the EFTA, is largely irrelevant to the charges against Maxwell and does not support her claims of error. On the contrary, to the extent it is relevant, far from exculpating her, it incriminates her or reinforces the correctness of the legal rulings Maxwell challenges.
She even cited Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement in Florida as a reason why she should never have been convicted by New York, claiming it as a defense . . . except it never even names her, lol.