679
submitted 1 week ago by Bell@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was personally and explicitly warned that Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar was planning a major attack roughly 10 days before the October 7 massacre, but dismissed the threat and did not alert his security chiefs, according to a shocking new Haaretz report.

The revelations come from research for an upcoming book Hostages: 843 Days of Abandonment, written by journalists Shlomi Eldar and Ruth Yuval, who writes for Haaretz.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] TheFogan@programming.dev 131 points 1 week ago

It really was isreals 9/11.

[-] MolochHorridus@piefed.social 90 points 1 week ago

He did nothing because he wanted to start genocide.

[-] TipRing@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago

He wanted any excuse to forestall the corruption trials for him and his wife. A forever war / genocide worked out perfectly for him.

[-] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Bingo. It's like 9/11 if you would believe it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago

It was my conspiracy theory from the beginning

The Mossad knows what I ate for breakfast and didn't know this?

They were able to infiltrate into Hezbollah so deeply that they could control their supply chain, fake a whole pager company from scratch and hide a remotely controlled bomb in every communication device, yet could not have any evidence of the terrorist attack planned by hundreds of people?

And by coincidence they had the excuse to start the purge and genocide?

[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

I'm not much of a conspiracy believer but Netanyahu said multiple times on camera that Hamas is good for Israel and given how surveiled Gaza was the theory that Israel allowed the attack is very convincing.

[-] YouTalkinToMe@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Who benefits most from that Oct. 7th attack?

[-] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago

On that note, as someone who laughed off all the “9/11 was an inside job” conspiracy theorists at the time, who benefitted the most from 9/11?

[-] borkborkbork@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

it's kept bibi and the right wing in power. but who's to say, maybe he's a rational and honest actor

one day israelis will wake and depose him, and russians will overthrow putin, and we'll impeach and imprison trump...

I can dream yo...

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago

Didn't they specifically reduce defenses in order to make sure it would be a big enough deal that they could play it for support of going on the offensive?

Or has that been debunked now?

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

It has not, at least that I’ve seen anywhere.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

Old news, but hopefully it catches this time.

They basically let Hamas attack and take hostages in order to have an excuse for the the current an ongoing genocide.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

hes doing this to stay out of jail himself they were very close to prosecuting him.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Dagnet@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

This is old news right? I remember reading about it a long time ago

[-] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 week ago

NYT did an analysis that came to the same conclusion like a month after the attacks, and posting it on Reddit got me banned from a lot of news subs.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I remember hearing about it, but not the source. It's in character for Israel though. Israel doesn't like Jews if they're the "wrong" kind of Jew. If Hamas had targeted a military base or political gathering, it probably would have been stopped before hand.

[-] anarchy79@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Sure is news to me.

even if he wasn't, he waited 7 hours to respond.

that's criminal.

imagine 9/11 but they waited 7 hours to send in emergency services.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago

In the case of 9/11, it might have been better if the first responders had held back. Much of the first wave got squashed.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 24 points 1 week ago

The Bush Administration were well aware that something was up just before 9/11, too, and deliberately ignored it, hoping to use it as a pretense for a war in Iraq, so Dick Cheney's Halliburton could take over the Iraqi oilfields. There are multiple documented instances where warnings were given directly to the highest levels, and literally NOTHING was done to investigate or prepare for it.

They probably thought there would be a car bomb or shooting or something, and we got 9/11.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] l3mming@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A reminder that Mossad's motto is: 'War by deception'

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Kinda what espionage is all about isn't it?

[-] hayvan@piefed.world 15 points 1 week ago

Is anyone surprised?

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Don't quote me on it but iirc there were even several barracks worth of soldiers told not to post to even basic security positions for the music festival that was happening that day.

[-] Siegfried@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Hamas was planning == was israel's plan, all along

[-] MountainVeil@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 week ago

He was able to make like thousands of beepers suddenly explode in people's faces or whatever it was, but there was no way they could have seen this massive attack coming.

[-] tacoplease@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Course he did. It was probably in the monthly status update from Hamas.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago
[-] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

In other news: things dipped in water become wet!

[-] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

"Well of course i knew it would happen, i planned it" /hj

[-] Professorozone@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

If this is true, who is the real enemy of Israel?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Fusselwurm@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'd really like to know about the frequency of false alarms.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] trashboat@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago

He was helping fund Hamas leading up to October 7th, too

[-] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I hate it when conspiracy theorists are proven right. It fuels the flames for so much chaos.

Next we'll find out the CIA really can read your thoughts and tinfoil hats really do prevent that.

If the conspiracy theorists aren't at least sometimes right they would be fully ignorable

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] MadBits@europe.pub 6 points 1 week ago

HAMAS was heavily funded through Qatar by Israel. They are literally funding different terrorist groups in order to create needed conflicts to justify takeover of land and invasions. They need it for The Greater Israel project.

They will also try to create biblical events through mass destruction in order to harness world wide control through mayhem, as that's their currency. They have no morals, no empathy and consider everyone else to be cattle for slaughter. They will spill as much blood as possible in order to get total control over the world. They want to see all nations bow to them, but they will never have it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] northendtrooper@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

If you know about unit 8200 then you know he was warned about the attack

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2026
679 points (98.6% liked)

News

39254 readers
1923 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS