16

The head of Italian auto suppliers lobby Anfia has urged the European Union to impose 80% tariffs on Chinese-made vehicles and parts above a certain threshold to safeguard Europe's ​car industry.

Anfia President Roberto Vavassori told Reuters that Chinese imports to the European Union ‌should be tariff-free up to 8% of annual European vehicle registrations, but with an 80% tariff on imports above that limit.

...

It should cover both vehicles and components, he said, as parts account for roughly 80% of a vehicle's value.

...

Figures from the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association (ACEA) showed that the share of Chinese-branded cars sold ​in the EU rose to top 9% in the first half of this year.

...

The EU imposes additional duties on Chinese-made electric vehicles on top of its standard 10% car import tariff, with the combined tariff burden ranging from roughly 18% to 45% depending ​on the manufacturer. The ​measures, introduced in 2024, ⁠are due to remain in force for five years.

...

Vavassori called into question Chinese carmakers' long-term commitment to building supply chains in ⁠Europe.

Automakers such ​as BYD and Chery are moving production to Europe, but ​have little interest in local sourcing, he said.

Their factories in Europe "are screwdriver factories," Vavassori said, predicting Chinese manufacturers will keep importing ​most components from China or low-cost countries close to Europe.

...

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

gee I kinda.. don't care if BMW or Mercedes or Stellantis survive this? They don't sell anything I can afford (or in stellantis' case, want) and I low key hate the people who can in this increasingly K shaped economy?

Just give me the cheap chinese shitbox, I got to get to work and shit.

[-] BigShammy80@feddit.org 0 points 5 days ago

“are screwdriver factories"

Thats what german car companies do for years. Shipping parts to china to let them build it together, because it is cheaper.

Now China does this on european ground and all of a sudden it is a big problem.

All is nice and good until money stops flowing in your pocket right?

[-] tardigrade@scribe.disroot.org 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Your comment is not true.

German carmakers (or any non-Chinese companies in any industry) are not even allowed to run a subsidiary in China. They always need a Chinese partner with whom they create a joint venture. The Chinese partner would then hold the majority of this joint venture, and it then uses Chinese supply chains. The parts are sourced in China.

This is, for example, why Volkswagen exited its joint venture with Chinese company SAIC a couple of years ago after the German company couldn't reliably prove that the supply chains in China were free of forced labour. The problem simply was (and still is) that Chinese supply chains are highly untransparent.

(The only exemption from China's rule to force foreign companies into a joint venture with Chinese companies is Tesla. The U.S. carmaker has no Chinese partner.)

this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
16 points (94.4% liked)

Europe

11999 readers
1069 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS