This is how every crypto coin has worked for ages. Who the fuck are the idiots still wasting money on them?
They are probably trapped in the year 2020, not sure why else they'd still care about Hunter Biden.
Looks like he scammed someone out of $198,000.
Just a guess, but maybe that's why they care.
I know it's victim blaming, but people gambling on meme coins deserve it. At this point I have to assume everyone is in on the scam and hoping there's a greater fool before the inevitable blow-off.
Literally none of them end up any different....
It's a game of chicken, people buy in while the price is going up, knowing eventually it will be worthless but betting they'll exit before anyone else.
And every single time the vast majority are wrong and lose money.
Everyone that buys it is both an idiot and knows what they're doing, but everyone who launches a coin is still a jackass ripping people off.
Hunter Biden’s $LAPTOP meme coin
goddammit not you too.
I don't really trust the NYPo - is it true that Hunter Biden performed a rug pull after only a week, and (almost) solely profited from this?
PS: don't forget that no Biden is going to candidate for the next election, so don't take this topic too seriously OK? And anyhow, it was clear from the start that the nazi posse would go after one of the weakest aspects of Joe Biden's life. We can admit this and still not (indirectly) support the brainworm posse.
I'm not sure if I'd have more or less respect for him if he did. Hell, I'd do a crypto coin rug pull right now if I had the connections. Everyone who loses has it coming. Buy my stupid fake coin and get what you deserve.
The guy is something like 15 mil in debt. I wonder if this was orchestrated be the people he owes money to and he was not given much choice in the matter. Either way, it's not like he's going to be able to keep any money he makes off this. It's more sad than shocking. The guy obviously does not care and was just trying to make a quick buck, which tracks with the little I know of him thus far.
I'm astounded he thought people would be willing to hire him for speaking engagements. Considering the current administration, I can't imagine institutions willingly associating with the Bidens unless it was strictly necessary. I also can't imagine he'd have anything worth imparting onto others. The only reason he's remotely relevant is because of who his father is, and I don't think that makes a good speaker.
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.