579
submitted 2 days ago by savvie@lemmy.zip to c/politics@lemmy.world

Lindsay Owens, president and CEO of Groundwork Collaborative, said the new data makes clear that “tax flight is nothing more than a myth, and should be given as much credence as flat-earthers.”

“If there was any merit to the myth that tax increases on New York’s wealthy drive them away, the new IRS data should show it,” said Owens. “It doesn’t—New York’s millionaire population kept climbing years after the state raised taxes on top earners.”

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Malica@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

Rich people are full of shit? You don't say! 😱

[-] masinko@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

Same thing happened in 2023 when Massachusetts imposed a 4% millionaire tax. Everyone parroted that businesses would leave, but the opposite happened. People moved in and the number of millionaires increased overtime.

[-] Sirdubdee@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago

They just changed their main residence to their NYC apartment to avoid the property tax on second homes.

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 1 day ago

And start to get taxed as primarily residence, so at the end the tax revenue got bigger

[-] wuffah@lemmy.world 97 points 2 days ago

Rich people only pay taxes when they sell assets. Their “income” is usually loans against those assets.

Their rich do not contribute, they extract. That’s how they became rich. They need us, our cities, our labor, and our tax funded infrastructure to run their businesses. That’s why they come and that’s why they won’t leave.

[-] ZeroCool@piefed.ca 40 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You’re right, and that's why their threats to leave [insert city, state, country here] if they don’t get their way should always be ignored. It’s empty posturing from the Epstein class.

[-] Obituarykidney@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

It's not even a good threat. Like, do you know how much we hate you? Go if you're not going to make it worth it to have you around. We'll be better off.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

That isn't the natural order of the universe, some immutable law, like Gravity.

We can change that, and make those sorts of financial schemes illegal. We can force them to live off their money, and tax it as they access it. We can change the rules anytime we want.

[-] chahn.chris@piefed.social 46 points 2 days ago

The rich benefit when services are provided that keep the non rich around. It increases community vitality, food is better c culture is better, overall life quality is better.

The rich should be taxed for their own good, they may not like it but it is absolutely in their best interest.

[-] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

Yeah, shocking that when you don't force people into a life of poverty and semi decent small businesses are capable of existing...the areas suddenly start getting a little safer and people with disposable income stimulate the local economy

[-] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 62 points 2 days ago

They want to live where its nice and safe and clean. Well high taxes goes to that so why would they leave to places with lower tax and higher crime and grime?

[-] triptrapper@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

Exactly. The article doesn't explicitly make that point, but it's like... Lots of people are willing to pay higher rent for an apartment complex with a pool, even if their neighbors also get to enjoy the pool.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I know it's a metaphor, but I do find it weird that I never lived in an apartment complex with a pool where people actually used the pool.

[-] zwerg@feddit.org 20 points 2 days ago

A millionaire is hardly rich these days, especially somewhere like New York. That's barely enough to buy a modest apartment. I would describe that as middle class. The fact that so few formerly middle class people are now working poor is a significant issue IMHO. Genuine question - what are the stats for billionaires?

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Yeah the term hits both people with $2m and $850m. That said there are maybe 1,000 billionares in the U.S. and where they live is everywhere, they have too much money to not accidentally multiple houses. So if you have almost 200 billionaires in California, they also own homes in NY, Florida, or wherever else. Texas has a number.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The issue in NYC was that many of them live there full-time, but they declare a property in Florida or Texas or some other American tax haven as their primary residence, and beat NY and NYC out of their income taxes. So Mamdani has figured out a way to squeeze money out of these deadbeat financial hoarders anyway.

I suspect a lot of these "new" millionaire residents are just the same people who have shifted their primary residences to NYC because their accountants did the calculations, and it's cheaper to pay the state and city income taxes, which can be manipulated, than the pied-a-terre tax.

[-] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Either way NY benefits. They're not giving up their residence so whether they pay the higher pied-a-terre tax or less in primary residence tax, the city gets more revenue from them regardless compared to the 0 tax they paid previously.

Yeah I don't know how the states would investigate someone and prove they spent above/below 6 months at a location, and once you have say 4 houses, proving your primary residence should be A and not B, C, or D would get messy.

[-] Octavio@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago

Dang it. What else can we try? 🤣

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago
[-] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 27 points 2 days ago

It's almost like millionaires generally like to be around civilization, places with infrastructure, and things to do. I'm shocked!

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

Families of millionaires like to live like millionaires, with lots of places to shop, eat, be entertained, and spend their money. They want to do that in a place that has all that stuff, but is also safe. NYC was starting to feel less safe again under the last few mayors. Apparently, the Sociopathic Oligarchs feel differently about Mamdani's NYC.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

So the rich people lied to us?????

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 12 points 2 days ago

I would expect capital flight to be somewhat dose dependent but it's pretty clear it's a non-issue at the level of taxation we're discussing these days.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 days ago

It's such a weird argument. "They'll leave if you tax 'em!" OK, let's say that's true. Good riddance, what's the downside? And seeing over and over that it's not true, what's the downside?

What about billionaires?

this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
579 points (99.8% liked)

politics

31086 readers
2130 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS