this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
489 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59594 readers
3570 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

White House threatens to veto anti-EV bill just passed by US House::The bill would prevent the EPA from enforcing tougher new pollution standards.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 100 points 11 months ago

Good. This is just theater for the knuckle-dragging Republican base anyway. The dems who went along with it can eat a bag of dicks.

[–] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 73 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Anyone notice how many news stories nowadays start with "Republicans block or halt or shut down or remove something.... They aren't doing anything... Just keeping anyone else from doing anything

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 32 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (11 children)

People are probably getting sick of me saying this by now, but of course Republicans aren't doing anything, this is their philosophy. Their core beliefs are in conserving traditional hierarchies and norms. God over man, men over women and children, white over black, rich over poor, cis-het over LGBT people and other hierarchies.

Their actions are best understood through the lens of conservative philosophy and the maintenance or restoration of socio-economic hierarchies.

To achieve their goals, they really only need to do a few things legialativly,

  1. Stop progress and change
  2. Rollback change

You see 1 all the time, they dont even need to be in power to do it. They just need to get in the way. If they get power, you see 2, and since they're trying to rollback generational change, not even decades old precedent is safe (see Roe vs. Wade).

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 20 points 11 months ago

Considering their whole M.O. is regression or conservation of the status quo, that's not surprising

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's all they ever do when Democrats are in control. So annoying

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

If you want to be "the party of no" you can't allow things to happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 66 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)
[–] rsuri@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Except we've been trying everything else for decades now

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And there's still plenty more to try. They've barely even scratched the surface of the whole genocide-your-own-population thing

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FringeTheory999@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He never said that, but it's still a heck of a good quote.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but it's on a picture and I agree with it, because it's shitting on Americans, so I'm going to mindlessly parrot it!

[–] FringeTheory999@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

As an American I can honestly say "No lies detected".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 58 points 11 months ago

Fucking dipshit asshole bastard republiQans. Evil, stupid, sociopathic, and cheating every way possible. As usual.

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 56 points 11 months ago

Are you telling me, that my US rep Tim Fucking Walberg, that useless fuck, actually accomplished something? I'm actually kind of impressed. The bill is straight up dogshit, but he actually submitted something and dogged it through committee and got the full chamber to vote on something.

I call bullshit. Someone else did this, and pawned it off onto Tim. Either because they didn't want to be responsible for it, or they felt sorry for him. Hell, I feel sorry for him.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The White House's plan to boost electric vehicle adoption came under heavy fire in Congress on Wednesday.

Five Democratic Representatives joined the Republican majority to pass a bill that would prohibit the US Environmental Protection Agency from enacting stricter new corporate average fuel efficiency regulations that would require automakers to sell many more EVs by the year 2032.

But burning fewer hydrocarbons has become anathema to the modern Republican Party, and former President Donald Trump's administration focused some of its attention on undermining the EPA's ability to regulate tailpipe emissions or cut gasoline dependence.

A pair of Texas Democrats (Henry Cuellar and Vicente Gonzales), as well as Jared Golden (D-Maine), Donald Davis (D-N.C.), and Mary Peltola (D-Alaska) all voted with the Republican Party.

It says the EPA cannot "finalize, implement, or enforce" new vehicle pollution regulations that are meant to go into effect in 2027.

The White House strongly condemned the legislation, which it says would "catastrophically impair" the EPA's ability to regulate vehicle pollution, and President Joe Biden has threatened to veto the bill should it pass the Senate and be sent to his desk.


The original article contains 356 words, the summary contains 186 words. Saved 48%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Conyak@lemmy.tf 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why threaten, do it already.

[–] quigat@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

The bill has been passed by the House but not the Senate. It is not yet ready to be signed or vetoed.

load more comments
view more: next ›