157
submitted 6 days ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] santa@sh.itjust.works 23 points 6 days ago

Conservative Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented.

Such BS. Let’s pretend it’s a good rule. States run their elections.

By changing something as foundational as the envelope; or if it will be delivered; or if a single incorrect ballot invalidates thousands of votes is the main problem.

Having the system as it is in protecting the voting system.

But the parrots keep talking about fraud and they are only holding crackers.

[-] Triumph@fedia.io 11 points 6 days ago

Let's not forget that there's been decades of USPS carrying ballots without interfering. Changing that precedent now is most definitely infringing on State authority to operate elections.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago

Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a short concurring opinion, saying "there is at least a fair prospect that the final rule falls within the Postal Service's statutory authority."

Just a reminder so we don't feel too good. Brett Devil's Triangle Kavanaugh thinks it's perfectly acceptable for the post office to be in charge of US elections. Even though it is clearly a states right to manage their elections.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I guess Kavenaugh, Kagan, and Barrett didn't get big enough bribes.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

I think it's much simpler than that. They like the idea of a very powerful president because a powerful presidency is the only way to get unpopular conservative positions enacted. But they also really don't want things going to full-on dictatorship. Why? Because in a full dictatorship, the court is just as powerless as the legislature.

[-] funkreddit@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Something really bad is about to happen ***hope not ***

[-] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

Reposting my comment from another post about this..

Maybe it's just my distrust of the whole thing, but I wouldn't put it past them to do this just for plausible deniability, while the post office still rejects everything they can in accordance to trump's wishes.. That way people will trust mail in voting, and end up with their votes rejected anyway. They get exactly what they want while still giving some illusion of fairness.

Then, after the elections they'll just say whoops! USPS shouldn't have done that, and nothing will happen.

Edit: on another article about this..

Alito wrote in his dissent that the Postal Service “has broad authority to regulate the mail” and likely does have the power to enforce Trump’s restrictions.

So ya. It's a trap.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It is a dumb game of it hasn't happened yet.

Like you can apparently plan to subvert an election, put in policies to make it happen, and then execute those policies but until the harm has been generated no foul. It is beyond stupid.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Trollito is such an angry piece of shit that hates everything about the American experiment.

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Seinfeld_thats_a_shame.gif

I wonder how much spaghetti sauce is on the walls of wherever donnie was when he learned of this.

this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2026
157 points (100.0% liked)

politics

31153 readers
3411 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS