483
submitted 3 weeks ago by Vanou@sopuli.xyz to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 96 points 3 weeks ago

It's the same with so many pedestrianised spaces. Every one becomes a cherished space for locals, boosts the economy. And every one was fought tooth and nail by those insisting car travel must be prioritized

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 53 points 3 weeks ago

It's often the local businesses who do the whining, being afraid that customers can't or won't access their store.

But if you just look at the picture, it's pretty easy to see a larger number of potential customers in the after picture. You can't really sell shit to people in cars unless you have a drive-in.

[-] vividspecter@aussie.zone 8 points 3 weeks ago

A big part is that business owners also don't want to lose their own parking spaces. So selfish and petty but as expected.

[-] skittle07crusher@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

And a fucking shit ton of (space reserved just for car) parking!

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

It's one of the culture wars that's definitely worth fighting.

[-] Squirrelsdrivemenuts@lemmy.world 35 points 3 weeks ago

I visited Paris this summer and was amazed by the nice walking areas and parks surrounding the Seine river. They even put up showers and mist curtains to help tourists and sportives deal with the heat.

[-] BooBees@fedinsfw.app 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Even here in Oklahoma City, in the middle of the reddest state in the US, we’ve added a massive walkable park in the middle of the city with heat relief misting stations, water parks, we’re in the middle of converting several roads and blocks into walkable neighborhoods, we’re adding greenbelts to the city in various spots to connect walkable areas and parks. Just last month our modern trolly system went from a small but annoying fare to permanently completely free for any rider. If we can do it, everyone can

[-] Malica@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago

That's amazing, gives me hope for red states

[-] Horsey@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It just goes show you that conservatives outside red red areas want to take away from the others even if it is against their interests. Red red areas have these things because there’s no bogeyman to blame for why public works are impossible.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 3 weeks ago

It's too bad that they removed the public seating though. Sitting next to water is nice

[-] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 weeks ago

Can't be having homeless loitering about

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 8 points 3 weeks ago

Hating the poor and disabled is a time honored tradition.

[-] altphoto@lemmy.today 4 points 3 weeks ago

Good eye. It makes me wonder.

[-] Dearth@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Looks like they removed all the concrete the benches were sitting on, exposed dirt next to the river is a good choice for many reasons.

[-] SalmiakDragon@feddit.nu 1 points 3 weeks ago

Such as? I can only come up with a vague "drainage maybe?"

[-] Dearth@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Dirt is cooler than concrete. You can plant stuff in it to reduce temperatures and provide habitat for wildlife.

[-] SalmiakDragon@feddit.nu 2 points 2 weeks ago

Oh, I know that. I guess your wording made me think there was some unique benefit to having dirt next to the river.

[-] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

They added some too if you like at the bottom of the frame.

[-] girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

It looks like theres some seating closer to the camera and also there's a kid on a swing. There could be seating hidden by the trees.

I like the more natural aesthetic that the newer video has. The exposured mulch/dirt is probably better for the trees anyways.

[-] Zarobi@aussie.zone 0 points 3 weeks ago

The homeless situation in Paris is pretty extreme, at least it was when I visited in 2015

[-] crakila@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

I was in Paris just last week and sure there were cars, but the amount of people that I seen using public transportation was unreal. It helps that they made the metro affordable for pretty much everyone.

(€2.55 (~$2.94 USD) flat fee across the Paris region, including Paris-to-suburbs, but excluding going to the Airports which are €14 (~$16.15 USD). Bus and Tram is €2.05 (~$2.36 USD) flat fee across the Paris region)

Walking was mostly what I did because I am simply in awe of the architecture across the city.

[-] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yall are apparently so spoiled that you think it wasn't pleasant before. A wide sidewalk, barely any cars, going slowly.

If you want a real horrorshow, check out Saint Petersburg's Neva embankments, which are major arterial roads where cars often go 100 km/h. There are pretty spacious sidewalks, but it's impossible to hear yourself think on there because of the cars.

[-] JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 weeks ago

Why'd they remove the benches though? Seems like they'd be even more useful next to a walking path.

[-] CactusEcho@piefed.social 8 points 3 weeks ago

People visit Paris and think this waterfront was always pleasant

The road marks are still visible.

[-] vividspecter@aussie.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It's not uncommon for shared paths and bike lanes to have road-style dividing lines.

[-] brem@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

I can see my bicycle over there in the bottom of that water, next to some cake recommending ladies head!

[-] gergolippai@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

actually it was pleasant before too. now it's pleasanter.

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You could almost say it's pleasanteur if it weren't a mistranslation 😌

[-] Horsey@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Plus de plaisir 😉

[-] altphoto@lemmy.today 4 points 3 weeks ago

Devil's advocate they did choose a gloomy day for the car video. And they did remove the benches. Sitting down to enjoy the day at that spot is great. Having to walk around is not great for some.

[-] gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago

Same time of year and weather?

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago

Both have trees without leaves and it appears to be sunny with a light breeze. Short of the temperature I’m not sure what else you’re asking for.

[-] gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

If it's more or less sunny, weekend vs weekday, if it was raining... I'd just like to know when the videos were taken.

[-] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah it's obviously nicer with more walking space, but the bottom is clearly a nicer day

[-] Sirius006@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

It might be a nicer day, but judging from people's clothes both are in winter.

[-] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Well, the sun makes a big difference in winter

[-] Sirius006@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If what you are asking is if there would be more pedestrians in the park if the weather was the same in both videos, the answer is no. On top of the wall on the right you have a 4 way street (quai de l'hotel de ville). Add to that the 2 ways street below and the minerality everywhere around, and you get a place that's unbearable for anybody that is not deaf.

About 20 years ago I did an internship in the summer a few hundreds meters from there. I was a student discovering city life, so I went to all the terraces and good spots in the area. I learned today threw this video that there was an accessible park there. Never heard of it threw the colleagues that lived here or the people I met.

On the other hand there is a good spot on the bank of the quai de Bourbon, just across the river (I just checked, it's less than 100m away if you can fly). I went there several times for picnic and it was always overcrowded. It was in the summer though.

If you want to see for yourself, you've got plenty of pictures in streetview taken in the summer when the cars were there. It's pretty much empty. You even have more peoples in the pictures taken in november after the works.

[-] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

You know, I hadn't considered the noise aspect, yeah. With little foliage by the river and stone walls (pretty as they may be), the noise of traffic would definitely be bouncing off the concrete right at that walkway unmitigated.

[-] Sirius006@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

To be fair most old European cities are very minerals with relatively narrow street so the car noise is a bigger problem than it should.

I think that is among the reasons that explains the popularity of the policies aiming to reduce car space inside Paris. The avenues made by Haussman are bad as well on this aspect

Even though cars didn't exist then, there was a famous architect contemporary to Hausmann who vehemently criticized his "corridor" avenue and was proposing to put the courtyards between/ in front of the buildings instead of inside or beside them. He called that "boulevard à Redans", and the idea is awesome, and I suppose this would have helped with the noise problem :

[-] thenoirwolfess@fedinsfw.app 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Is that the road from Taken? With a tunnel further up?

[-] llii@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago

I thought of The Bourne Identity, the car chase with the mini.

[-] vivalapivo@lemmy.today -1 points 3 weeks ago

What is it even supposed to mean

[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

the clue may be on the community's name

[-] vivalapivo@lemmy.today -2 points 3 weeks ago

No fuck you, I'm not a car

[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 6 points 3 weeks ago

You are supposed to fuck the cars, silly!

[-] wieson@feddit.org 10 points 3 weeks ago

It means, we have to fight for beauty, build enjoyability. It doesn't come by itself.

this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2026
483 points (99.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

16758 readers
435 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS