169
submitted 7 hours ago by who@feddit.org to c/news@lemmy.world
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

I live in rural Nevada and they just installed 2 flock cameras here in my town of less than 4k people. Pretty much everyone is so happy about it saying it will help with all the crime here.

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I’d demand a list of all the crime and a list of all the “helped with crime” to start being kept.

I’m tired of such claims never being followed up on. We need some sort of Flock cameras for that meta-problem.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Someone on here is always saying that they also log Bluetooth and wifi MACs and associate these with images. Doesn't sound like that's the case though.

[-] Manjushri@piefed.social 2 points 1 hour ago

Some people are jumping the gun. The newest versions of the cameras are supposed to be able to do that , but they have not been deployed yet. Or at least not deployed widely.

as my colleague here at The Drive unfortunately discovered first-hand last month. Leonardo has more recently marketed a new product called SignalTrace that isn’t an ALPR but can be paired with them to correlate plates with various wireless signals, including Wi-Fi and Bluetooth as well as frequencies emitted by everything from tire pressure monitoring sensors to pet microchips.

Mind you, I personally take these claims with a grain of salt. I know personally that you have to hold a normal scanner right against a dog or cat's skin to pick up the microchip. I don't believe a roadside sensor is going to pick up a pet's microchip as you drive by.

[-] Tiral@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Water is wet, and cigarettes cause lung cancer, just in case anyone didn't already know Flock cameras are absolute bullshit.

[-] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 50 points 7 hours ago

Flock insists its cameras do not perform face recognition. WIRED and 404 Media found no evidence of any face-recognition capabilities in the camera’s software beyond ones included by default in the Android operating system. Those capabilities did not appear to be enabled or in active use.

No, the servers the images are sent to do. Weasel words.

[-] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 26 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Ya why would they put anything in the application layer when it can be done on the back end? This is standard for anything connected to the internet as long as latency is not an issue.

[-] violentfart@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Reminds me of that time our product caught fire because of a damaged battery, and the suits bullied the in-house regulator for an hour until he officially recorded it as not using the word “fire”

[-] IMALlama@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Ah, a thermal event. The company I work for had a similar policy, but we're now free to say the f-word again.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

So it was an unplanned rapid oxidation event then was it?

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
169 points (99.4% liked)

News

39207 readers
3246 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS