144

Archived link

...

On Sept. 10, Prime Minister Mark Carney and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced a series of initiatives to expand Canada’s defence capabilities and support Ukraine.

Industry participants say Ukraine, now in its fifth year of war with Russia, has considerable battlefield experience Canada can learn from.

...

Six Canadian defence suppliers [aare] receiving federal contracts worth up to $50 million in total to produce drones and uncrewed ground vehicles.

Last week, Carney also announced a partnership between Ottawa-based General Dynamics Mission Systems-Canada and Ukrainian company Green Tech Harvest to produce drones and related technologies.

That partnership is the latest in a series of Canada-Ukraine drone arrangements. In May, Hamilton-based Sentinel Research and Development also announced a drone production agreement with Ukrainian defence company Airlogix.

...

The goal is ambitious: to give Canadian industry the capacity to produce “millions of drones over the next two years,” according to the Prime Minister’s Office.

Ottawa says the initial contracts will “increase the number of drones currently deployed by the Canadian Armed Forces tenfold.”

Much of this production will go to Ukraine.

“Thirty per cent of these drones will go to Ukraine immediately to [the] battlefield,” Zelenskyy said during the joint press conference with Carney.

...

Sergii Vlashchenko and Igor Kolosiuk, Ukrainian defence-technology experts and co-founders of Vancouver-based Snake Island Lab, say such qualities have enabled Ukraine to hold its own against a larger and wealthier Russia.

“Every large brigade, every army corps … has its own research and development laboratory, manufacturing capabilities, and financing capabilities inside the corps,” Vlashchenko said in a joint interview with Kolosiuk.

“It lets them face a challenge, invent to overcome it, and manufacture the response within weeks.”

...

A June study found that Ukrainian producers could move from prototype to deployment in weeks, with some minor fixes implemented within 24 hours.

The cost benefits of this approach are considerable.

Ukraine spends as little as US$200 to $1,000 on a typical FPV drone. Before Ukraine popularized these drones, the U.S. military could have previously spent as much as US$53,000 for the closest equivalent.

...

Kolosiuk says Ukraine is looking to Canada for a more secure supply chain. He says the two countries could build a scalable, non-Chinese supply chain serving both the Canadian and Ukrainian militaries.

...

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] kbal@fedia.io 23 points 5 days ago

Seems like a promising strategy. If we really must spend money on the military, there aren't many better ways to do it than by getting good at drones. Our government may not have too many good ideas of its own, but at least they're able to recognize one when it comes from Zelenskyy.

[-] grte@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 days ago

Inasmuch as we must invest in the military, this is a smart way to go about it. It's clear that drone technology is a tectonic shift. In the same way that artillery made castles obsolete, tanks and planes made trench warfare obsolete, the aircraft carrier made the battleship obsolete, now the drone torpedo will make the aircraft carrier obsolete, as merely one example of the ways drones are changing how war is waged.

Of course, one of the ways drones are revolutionizing things is that they are relatively cheap. Iran spends something like 20 billion a year on defence and is getting a lot of value out of those dollars. So I'm skeptical that we needed to triple our military budget.

[-] orioler25@lemmy.ca -5 points 4 days ago

You people talk like there aren't ample examples of this not being true. The US military has always had a technological advantage over its targets, and yet loses nearly every war it wages. They use that advantage as a threat because of its rapid destructive potential, not to win the actual fighting.

They're doing this for private capital and to facilitate an automated fighting force as conditions worsen. It's transparent.

[-] Canconda@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

and yet loses nearly every war it wages.

Yea because the USA keeps invading countries of people with no intention of leaving. The only win condition is genocide.

"You will kill 10 of our men, and we will kill 1 of yours, and in the end it will be you who tire of it."

  • Ho Chi Minh

"America has the watches, but Taliban has the time"

  • Taliban
[-] i_love_FFT@jlai.lu 7 points 4 days ago

How to prevent these companies from then being purchased by USA interests and syphon the technology to them?

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

A very important issue that isn't brought up often enough in discussions about investment into private assets that are supposed to increase our independence. The related one being foreign investment in such assets.

[-] oscarmeyer82@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

I haven't read anything on this beyond this post but I hope a large part of this investment goes toward constructive drone technology, not just a destructive military focus. There's a ton of overlap in developing the knowhow, manufacturing capacity, supply chains etc. There would be some unique requirements for defense applications but I'd rather us focus on developing things like agricultural or forestry drones with the ability to reassign those industries to defense if needed.

[-] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago

There's a big emphasis on "dual use" technologies right now as a way to use military spending to have wider benefits. I'm not too worried.

[-] Canconda@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago

non-military drones have the potential to completely change the logistics of the future.

Stoner idea that I low key hope someone steals: Bong Subscription. Basically a drone delivers you a clean bong and takes away the dirty one.

[-] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Clean your bong man.

[-] orioler25@lemmy.ca -4 points 4 days ago

OP's post history is very similar to right-wing bots in the early days of the r/Canada takeover, interesting; wonder why.

[-] Scotty@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 2 days ago

@orioler25@lemmy.ca

I have never been on Reddit. This is the platform where this "tankies" have been banned some time ago, right?

[-] orioler25@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Just coming out with it eh? Huge self-report to say that it was "tankies."

Wasn't saying it was you specifically, just that chuds like you are obvious and consistent. I see you bud.

this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2026
144 points (98.6% liked)

Canada

12419 readers
656 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS