802

A Tennessee grandmother who spent six months in jail after facial recognition tech falsely linked her to a North Dakota bank fraud investigation now wants compensation for what happened. Angela Lipps is suing the City of Fargo and a Fargo Police Department detective for $10 million over the incident, which led to the loss of her home, car, and dog.

In July 2025, a team of US Marshals arrested 50-year-old Lipps in Tennessee at gunpoint while she was babysitting four young children. She was booked into the county jail in Tennessee as a fugitive from justice wanted in North Dakota.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

I had to fix this….

Grandmother launches $10 million lawsuit after being jailed for six months due to faulty AI facial recognition.

[-] Narauko@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Why are headlines these days written backwards all the time? Is this an AI generation issue, or stupid "journalism standard"?

Without punctuation, this headline implies that Grandma's negligence with facial recognition resulting in being arrested and sued for $10 million.

[-] MBech@feddit.dk 5 points 2 days ago

I read it more like the grandma was jailed, because Fargo and detectives were hit by a $10m lawsuit due to a facial recognision mistake.

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 42 points 3 days ago

I've heard about these things happening before.

The cops have surveillance video of a suspect, and they feed it into a face recognition AI. The AI then searches for people who look like the suspect.

It's not finding the suspect. It's finding pictures of people who look like the suspect. The cops are supposed to use that to determine if anyone the AI identified possibly could be the suspect.

However, any stupid, lazy cop will pretend that is sufficient and away they go.

From what I've read, the face matching applications even state clearly that the match doesn't constitute any kind of proof that the person identified is actually guilty of anything. Anyone with any brains would understand that you need to have independent verification before even considering arresting someone. Unfortunately, the government doesn't want people with brains working as cops.

This is even dumber, the suspect on camera looks nothing like the grandma.

The AI recognition instead made the mistake by comparing the known-to-be-fake ID the suspect used to the innocent grandmas face.

[-] Poojabber@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

They dont hire cops for their brains.... im not entirely sure what the credentials for cops are, but brains is probably a disqualification.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] rekabis@lemmy.ca 93 points 4 days ago

Detective Lucas Heck proceeded with charges despite knowing that Lipps lived in Tennessee, had never visited North Dakota, did not match the physical description of the suspect captured on surveillance footage, and had no unexplained funds linking her to the thefts.

Wow, ACAB. How wildly incompetent are they?

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago

I hope the lawsuit succeeds and stings the precinct hard.

Since the officers themselves can hide behind good faith and qualified immunity it becomes necessary to penalize the institution for hiring unprofessionals who overdepend on technology and draw their guns in advance.

It's crap like this that fuels the movement to abolish the police. And yeah, I think that model for responder is obsolete.

[-] varyingExpertise@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

The city will pay, not much else will happen.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 3 days ago

It's "funny" how they never call it "AI" in these kinds of fail tales.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Avicenna@programming.dev 28 points 3 days ago

Welcome to the future, you don't have to be afraid if you didn't do anything wrong.

[-] Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago

(Being poorer than the 1% is defined as something wrong)

[-] palordrolap@fedia.io 152 points 4 days ago

In an ideal world, she'd win every penny and the money would come out of the assets of each and every person involved in her arrest, including their immediate superiors so that lessons would be learned.

She lost her assets through no fault of her own. Seems only fair that they should lose theirs, if not worse, because they actually did something wrong.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Corvidae@lemmy.world 46 points 4 days ago

10 Million seems low to me. Cars and homes can be replaced: pets and neighbors and community cannot be replaced, they are priceless.

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] bedwyr@piefed.ca 90 points 4 days ago

The companies that run this facial recognition should be the ones to pay first and foremost. The villains never pay themselves, we are paying victims from the taxes of the victims.

[-] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The cops gave the software company a fake id and said "anybody look like this picture in this fake ID?". Then the software company says "yeah that picture on the fake ID looks a lot like this grandma in tennesee."

That's on the cops 100%.

[-] Batman@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago

I mean while they should be punished for their involvement, the CV didn't keep her in prison for six months

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Wolf314159@startrek.website 6 points 3 days ago

Fun fact, North Dakota (home of the idiot cop and criminally evil prosecutor) has a fewer people than the city of San Francisco in about 150,000 times the acreage. Put another way, there are about 268,000 people per electoral vote in North Dakota compared with about 728,000 people per electoral vote in California and about 670,000 people per electoral vote in Tennessee (home of the grandmother).

[-] BitsAndBites@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

Shit like this sucks because it's the taxpayers that get stuck with the bill. I'm so sick of these huge companies using taxpayers to pay for everything because they dont want to spend their vast fortunes. We see the same thing with huge tax write offs for building things with the promise of more trickle down benefits.

[-] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The taxpayers vote for these idiot tough on crime prosecutors though. Whens the last time you ever heard a voter say competency and avoiding insanely dumb lawsuits was one of their top issues? It's always jobs/crime/immigrants/other people have sex in ways i dont like. Nothing else matters to voters and that's why shit like this keeps happening.

[-] IronBird@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

really need to tie these judgement payout to the police pensions, see how quickly they acrually start policing their own

[-] FoxAlive@lemmy.zip 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The big talk lately is about making ai your public defender.

So imagine getting fasley accused of a crime and your Ai lawyer throws the case in everyway possible.

At that point we might as well make ai the judge jury and executioner.

Thanks palantir.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 30 points 4 days ago

And the state? They jailed her with insufficient proof.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

they jailed her with pretty much no proof, pretty much a call from north dakota sayin "go arrest this grandma"

[-] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

Buried in the article, it came out that the face they used as "proof" was the picture on the FAKE ID that the actual suspect used. They did exactly 0 investigative work. The computer spat out a picture with a name and they just went in guns drawn.

In front of kids.

The only "good" part I guess is that they didn't shoot her or the kids.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fredselfish@sh.itjust.works 37 points 4 days ago

Hope she gets every single dime and that cops loses every fucking thing he owns. Ruin her life knowing goddamn well she was not guilty.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

I remember this story.

This is why facial recognition is bullshit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dan1101@lemmy.world 42 points 4 days ago

Every person that did the shoddy police and prosecution work should have to lose their house and spend 6 months in jail to keep their jobs.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 46 points 4 days ago

How was this not like immediatly cleared up, dont people have bond hearings within the week, whos rubber stamping this shit

[-] DillDough@lemmy.zip 77 points 4 days ago

Everybody should just periodically read random court cases, this stuff has always been extremely common and the sop when the mistakes are uncovered is to double down, just attempt to fully bury the innocent person in the system. This is a daily occurrence in every single state in the US.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] rezifon@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago

The lawsuit should include whoever wrote that train wreck of a headline, too

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2026
802 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

88185 readers
3038 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS