518
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 53 points 2 days ago

«Never again is now» is such a good slogan

[-] rekabis@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

Jury nullification has its place. This is one of them.

I am shocked at how free speech has been censored in so many western countries. A requirement to prove your statements, fine. A prohibition on patently false statements, sure. Let’s put guardrails up that nerf clearly bad actors like holocaust deniers and other bigots that target large swaths of humanity.

But being arrested protesting AGAINST genocide? Holy hell, things have gotten bad over there. As a Canadian, I feel sorry for my political parents.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 118 points 3 days ago

The judge interrupted several times in the first few sentences, telling Olax that references to Genocide were inadmissible. Court security were then ordered to remove Olax to the cells, and the judge summed up the case and sent the jury away to deliberate without the defendant present.

Unusually, Olax was not even returned to the court to hear the verdict.

Hmmm yes much legal system, very justice.

load more comments (85 replies)
[-] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 138 points 3 days ago

The judge, Mr Recorder M Chawla KC, withdrew any lawful defences from Olax Outis, who, continuing their protest, refused to stand for the judge throughout the trial, instead only standing out of respect for the jury whenever they were brought in or out of the court.

So fucking based.

[-] Cherry@piefed.social 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I wonder if that had any impact on the result. Logic response would be the jurors applied the process based on the evidence but when the judge is clearly dismissive, it really leaves them no choice. But I am curious if the level of condescension by the was a major psychological factor.

[-] SacralPlexus@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

Direct link to the text of his full closing speech which is excellent.

[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 136 points 3 days ago

Its a short article, but it actually feels good to read. The judge tried to fuck him over and the guy represented himself, but the jurors saw through the bullshit.

Every now and then the good guys win one.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2026
518 points (99.1% liked)

United Kingdom

6927 readers
608 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS