295
submitted 4 days ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

Anger is growing this week as more details emerge about the Trump administration's detention of Somali immigrants at Guantánamo Bay, including people with no criminal records and, in at least one case, a legal US resident.

At least eight Somali men are being held at the notorious US military base in Cuba, while as many as 12 Somali deportees have passed through the facility in recent weeks, according to Sahan Journal. Seven of those still there are being held at Camp 6, which was originally opened under the George W. Bush administration during the so-called War on Terror to imprison men and at least one child in a facility rife with torture and other abuse.

“I never expected to be arrested in a prison established for the terrorists who I fled from,” 31-year-old Hassan Abdi Abtidoon told Sahan Journal's Mohamud Farah on Tuesday.

Among the other Somalis held at Guantánamo is 31-year-old Adam Abdullah, a St. Paul, Minnesota, resident who came to the United States as a legal asylum seeker in 2023. Abdullah had a work permit and Social Security number, operated an auto repair business, and had no criminal record, according to Minnesota court records. His past involvement with law enforcement appeared to include nothing more than two parking tickets. Security claimed the flight included "some of the worst of the worst" with criminal histories including assault, weapons offenses, robbery, theft, drug charges, and drunken driving. ...

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 38 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

There's always going to be awfulness in Guantanamo Bay. That's what it is for.

It's 50 miles of seized Cuban land. The USA uses this as a concentration camp because they can. Because it's illegal, and it's not even in US territory, everything they do there is to circumvent US laws and oversight. Otherwise, why bother transporting prisoners there?

It's not a "prison established for terrorists". We've "owned" it since 1900, it's a military base, our first overseas one.

The "prison" within is a place for people to disappear without any trial. So it's not even a prison, really; nobody has been found "guilty". The only reason we know about this are photo leaks, otherwise we'd be oblivious.

The USA has camps like this all over the world, last time I checked it was 800 or so. We'll never know how many have "prisons", but I'd guess all of them as needed. Most camps have a "brig", to turn it into a "prison" you just change the plaque on the door from "brig" to "prison". (a little joke, there is no difference).

There's only one thing for certain; bOtH sIdEs are fine with these illegal holes that employ torture, regardless of claims to the contrary. It is not the Trump admin, the Bush admin, the Clinton admin, the Obama admin, the Biden admin.

It's every admin in our lifetime. All of them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_Naval_Base

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Obama signed an executive order to close Guantanamo bay. Congress signed a veto proof funding bill that kept it open. So yes both Democrats and Republicans wanted to keep it open at that time, but the "Obama admin" made it clear it was supposed to be closed.

The Senate voted 90-6 against the funds they requested to move the prisoners to actual u.s. prisons in the states.

Edit: In 2015 he vetoed another bill permanently banning the prisoners being moved to the states, congress over road him with the NDAA and sent it back with once again non-veto-able numbers

[-] NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 days ago

This always pisses me off about Obama. He ran on closing Guantanamo. If Congress would not provide funds to move the prisoners to the USA, he should have released them.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Same situation as it was with universal healthcare, Obama wanted the appearance of caring about his voters but he was never willing to actually fight for them when the rich and powerful opposed something. He made more attempts at Social Security than he did at closing Guantanamo.

[-] diocesegoldmine@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

both sides are fine with these illegal holes that employ torture, regardless of claims to the contrary.

But surely voting for my favourite politicians (class traitors) will change the nature of a genocidal police state...? /s

[-] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

You can't call a country democratic and have a prison where the laws don't apply. And I ask Americans to use the terms "gulag" or "concentration camp" because Guantanamo is exactly that.

BTW, the Guantanamo gulag was established by George W Bush and was used by Bill Clinton, George Bush Jr., Barack Obama, Donald Trump and Joe Biden. All of them can't be called democrats precisely because they sent people to a concentration camp without being convicted. Less than Stalin, but still.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 days ago

the Guantanamo gulag was established by George W Bush and was used by Bill Clinton,

How does this work exactly? Does it involve time travel?

[-] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah, I mixed Bushes, the one with W is a Jr, had to check. Newer knew American' presidents, who was who.

[-] peacepath@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

That is interesting, and I genuinely wonder if a table of people sent to some "gulag like" prison could be done by leader and per year at power. So it would be easier to compare... even if we add some other leaders from other countries later...

[-] BooBees@fedinsfw.app 16 points 4 days ago

Yeah, like we said - it was never about “if they’re doing it the right way, we are fine with immigrants” - modern Republicans are racists, and bigots in general. We said that consistently and consistently got push back saying that kind of rhetoric was divisive and incendiary. Turns out ramping up violence, pain, death, and fear was exclusively the plan all along, just not from people warning everyone what was coming.

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

The entire idea behind the ICE saga is to create an under-underclass. There is already a permanent underclass of people who will never get the same economic chances those at the top get. This debacle aims to create another one under the current one to keep the poors in line.

Basically: "So you're already barely surviving working three jobs, but don't forget - we could always deport you or your family as well!"

this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2026
295 points (98.4% liked)

News

39254 readers
1964 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS