2

Obviously not open source and AI companies don't care about copyright but in theory does it cover it?

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.en

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top new old

"No Derivatives" sounds like it might offer protection, but that's technically if they take your work and transform it.

If you're referring to Attribution being a requirement and then AI is trained on your image, attribution is practically impossible regardless of the legality (that doesn't make it right)

There might be some argument about Fair Use or Fair Dealing, but IANAL

Although I'll reiterate your own point because it's the most essential: AI companies don't care

[-] deeprlyeh@lemmus.org 2 points 1 week ago

Unless you distill their model.

[-] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

It would not

[-] one_old_coder@piefed.social -1 points 1 week ago

Feel free to sue Microsoft, Google, Facebook, and that idiot Sam Altman, and tell us how much money you got.

(the answer is no obviously)

this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2026
2 points (66.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

4340 readers
10 users here now

There is no such thing as a Stupid Question!

Don't be embarrassed of your curiosity; everyone has questions that they may feel uncomfortable asking certain people, so this place gives you a nice area not to be judged about asking it. Everyone here is willing to help.


Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca still apply!


Thanks for reading all of this, even if you didn't read all of this, and your eye started somewhere else, have a watermelon slice ๐Ÿ‰.


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS