129
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 43 points 3 weeks ago

This is interesting but it's essentially a protocol attack against a certain type of RSA signature. It talks about PKCS5 not being affected. Says nothing about OAEP which I'd hope also holds up.

[-] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 weeks ago

So for RSA without padding, a threat actor could request lots of tokens (without getting rate-limited?), and use that as information to more precisely focus efforts to brute-force the key, and thereby reducing the number of operations required to do so? Or am I misunderstanding it?

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

That's what I think I read as well.

[-] Malica@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 weeks ago

Oh good, more bad news

[-] PushButton@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

The practical risk is limited, but still significant. Applying the attack against the deprecated use of 1024-bit keys took a handful of months on an academic CPU cluster, significantly less than the current estimates for 1024-bit factoring that would require resources that only nations or companies with massive resources could achieve. Widely used RSA implementations are also safe.

Bold emphasis is mine. It's a nothing Burger article.

[-] MangoCats@feddit.it 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I was "following key length recommendations" 10 years ago that said 3072 bit or higher for RSA. At that time, lightweight processors would struggle a bit with 4096 bit keys, so I've launched a fair number of systems with 3072 bit keys - none of the data on any of them is worth a handful of months on a CPU cluster.

Though, there is an interesting metric you can put on key value today, because so much compute is available for short term lease, you can literally spend $1m for a 50/50 shot at cracking a "very secure" key in a few hours, because you pay per unit of compute, not per hour. Now, Amazon or whoever might start refusing your business if you tried to spend $1M on compute in parallel all running within a single hour, but you could probably negotiate with them to get that done in low demand slots over a couple of days.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 3 weeks ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2026
129 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

88941 readers
4505 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS