State sanctioned murder is the most obvious sign of a people who have mentally yet to leave the cave.
Death sentences as punishment is backwards and counter to the goal. Ending life is not a punishment, it is disposal. At best it is cathartic revenge for the victims and their loved ones. But true punishment would be a long term restriction of rights and reparations through service and financial donation. And really, rehabilitation should always be the primary (if not exclusive) goal of the justice system.
State sanctioned killing of a prisoner should only be performed for compassionate purposes or maaaaaybe in the exceptionally vanishingly rare case that someone is genuinely too dangerous to even keep in prison with others in which case it is more humane than permanent solitary or sedation into catatonia. And, in either case, it should be heavily regulated and only allowable if medical and mental health professionals sign off of on it.
And I bet they wouldn't return their shopping carts either.

Estos americanos me dan tanto miedo como los chinos y los rusos, son un masa amorfa de psicópatas
Y no crean que esroy defendiendo a esta loca, pero... pena de muerte? Muchachos, evolucionen un poco.
USA is a country of extreme violence, the death penalty is a disgrace and USA is not a worthy democracy for having it.
"is not a democracy" is all - not even European countries are, when you consider capitalist lobbyism. But Magastan is not even trying to pretend it is anymore.
There are levels of quality of democracies, Scandinavian countries score high, and yes they are democracies, but no democracy is perfect, although a handful of countries are close.
But USA is the most flawed (worst) democracy of the western developed world, with a 2 party system and FPP voting, and extreme powers to a single person which in itself is obviously undemocratic despite the president is somewhat democratically elected.
Power should never be centralized like that, it's like USA is electing a dictator for 4 years.
"these so called democracies aren't actually democracies because they serve capitalist interests"
"AAACTUALLY, they are democracies, they say so"
Pike does not deny her guilt, but her attorneys and supporters argue a death sentence is not appropriate for a crime committed at that age by a teen with untreated mental illness after a childhood of brutal sexual abuse and neglect. Slemmer’s mother wants the lethal injection to go forward, saying she has waited decades to see Pike’s sentence carried out.
Jesus fuck
Is it just me or are Americans uniquely bloodthirsty and their justice system is focused on revenge more than in civilized countries? I don't really notice many stories from Europe where victims demand more punishment decades after a crime happened. I'm sure many individuals want criminals that hurt them be punished as harshly as possible but I don't see the media focusing on in that much. It's like in Europe it's understood that the punishment has to, above all, serve the society, not satisfy the victim.
I remember watching a doc about re-sentencing of minors sentenced to life in prison after some Supreme Court decision. They were showing a kid who got life in prison at 16 for armed robbery. When his sentence was re-evaluated he was 30+, got educated in prison and was clearly resocialized and ready to be a productive citizen. The victim (the cashier that was threatened with a gun) showed up at the trial and said that he should stay in prison because she would not feel safe with him walking freely. Not only don't I understand how someone can be so vindictive but also why a justice system would pay so much attention to the desires of an individual who's the worst possible person to give an opinion about the case. The guy's life sentence was turned into 50 years so he was set to get out of prison at 66... Such a fucked up country.
Americans aren't adults, they are more concerned with "punishing bad guys" than they are actual justice
And then people wonder why Americans don't revolt. Clearly they know nothing of our "justice" system. One misstep or perceived misstep sends people to prison or death row for decades
It's not just you.
Their justice system is pretty archaic in a eye for an eye way. Interestingly criminology (the study of crimes including the effects of punishment) is most prominent in the USA yet has the least impact in their own country.
However the spiral is the same everywhere. A brutal crime is commited, as an easy answer (because solving underlying issues is unpopular and won't garner votes) the sentences are made stricter. That however never helps
A mentally unwell teenager, who's life was full of sexual abuse and neglect up to that point, in a fit of jealous rage...
I think she deserves more empathy than lindsey clancey. Where are the protests for this woman? the mothers carting their babies to the courthouse with signs? Where are the donations?
The death penalty is barbaric. Even in cases like this where the person admits (or does not deny) guilt, the primary reason we should not have a death penalty is to spare the innocent. The only way to be certain that we never execute an innocent person is to never execute anyone at all. People actually guilty of their crimes like Christa Pike can spend the rest of their lives in prison.
That's because death penalty is not about justice, is about revenge.
It can also be about "this person is too dangerous to contain."
My view on the death penalty is that some crimes ultimately deserve it. However, I believe that the state should never have the right to execute its own citizens. The government should not be trusted with the power to set laws and execute people. They can change the laws and make whatever crime they want subject to the death penalty.
So morally I find the death penalty okay in some cases, but practically I find it unusable
Honestly, and this is definitely a hot take, it feels more evil to indefinitely imprison someone than to simply execute them. I hope policing false positives become less of a thing in my lifetime, because both options blow
You can release the wrongfully imprisoned, you cannot un-execute someone. So its more humane to allow them to live, even if its incarcerated. I do agree that prison systems need to be reformed entirely and focus more on rehabilitation than punishment, but Ill take the easy answer to 'how do you prevent wrongful executions' first.
I feel like we should let the for-life prisoner decide which they want
"Do you want to die or live the next 50 years in a cell?" I don't think a lot of people would be choosing to stay alive under those circumstances.
I think you underestimate people's love of living, even under bad circumstances.
America has a President responsible for raping children, murdering their bastard babies, then proceeding to murder hundreds more children and other innocents in his campaign of egotistical terror.
There absolutely is fucking room for a death penalty. Beyond reasonable doubt. Fuck off with the puritan crap.
Abolishing the death penalty is not about punishing the truly guilty, its about sparing the innocent. How many wrongful executions would you accept just so truly guilty people can also be executed?
Also kinda funny to see the Puritans mentioned in this way when the Puritans are well known for witch hunts and public executions of those supposed witches lmao, quite literally wrongful executions exemplified

What movie [music] is this from?
Primetime, about the To Catch a Predator show [music] from the 00s. I don't think it's out yet
thats crazy she been locked up longer than i been alive dam
Anyone who entrusts the state with the power to execute those it already has in captivity and isolated from the public are morons
I'd personally also rather not execute the ones that are out in the general population, but you can choose your own hill I guess.
That’s an incredibly tragic story from all angles.
It is incomprehensible to imagine living for 30 years in prison. There has to be a better solution than this.
With fascists, cruelty is always the point
ooh can it be marsha bla- oh.
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.