Well, you could either change your ways or get used to being tired, because when you're hateful scum, people treat you like you are.
From the "fuck your feelings" party.
Its not journalism its just facts karen 😂 Catholic too right? Cool story snowflake.
Editorials are not journalism and should not be confused for journalism.
Conservatives should not be confused for rational, thinking people.
That's why they operate almost exclusively in editorials to the point that they think editorials are news.
Exactly, and FOX News self feeds on its own shit by cycling around in the morning with their live editorials saying this then they turn around and say some people are now saying X.
But this doesn't explain OP though.
Exactly. If someone tells me they vote R I immediately think of them having this level of logical thinking skills.

this shit bag site blocks VPNs with a generic access issue message, btw
before people bother trying to give them clicks
Not all VPNs. Mine works just fine. Though it's a shit site regardless of its access policies.
Try swapping servers. Mine works.
You can only conserve so many brain cells before it backfires.
You only have so many IQ points in your life and she's saving them up until the bitter end.
I think she has a lot of Idiot Quotient points.
Classic case of if you don't use it you lose it.
How about you stop trying to regulate who I can sleep with and marry? How about you stop trying to interject your fake sky daddy into my medical care by denying me the right to an abortion, or gender affirming healthcare if I happen to be trans? Conservative women spout nothing but hate and intolerance; they are reaping what they sow.
This is pretty much the issue right here, she just can’t see it. The core of conservatism is virile hatred, autocratic thinking, and otherism. They think that people are being mean because they go to church and are mothers. Or at least that’s what she said.
And those things mean nothing when it comes to conservatism. Trump made sure of that. Nowadays conservatism is fascism. And hating fascists isn’t wrong. But these people erase that part of their ideology so they can pretend to just be mothers and churchgoers who just can’t catch a break!

Cry me a river, dirtbags. You don't get to support restricting the freedoms of people you don't like and get a free pass.
In mainstream media, women like me are portrayed through a singular lens: Our conservative beliefs. As such, we are easy to hate, mock and scorn.
Um, that's how people should be judged, dumbass.
JFC, this entire thing reads like something out of The Onion: "boo hoo, I contain multitudes, but I adhere to hateful bullshit, why don't people tolerate meeeeee? What happened to acceptance and inclusivity?"
She’s so close to understanding that if her actions result in her unhappiness, maybe she should change her own behavior. But it’s a conservative way of thinking to stop short and blame everyone but yourself, and then project and say that’s the problem with the rest of the world, no personal accountability.

"As a conservative woman living in Texas, I often feel like I'm living a dual reality. I'm a mom and a writer, but that's not all. I go to church, laugh with friends and wave at my neighbors while we are walking our dogs.
Not the Mexicans though, because they shouldn't be allowed to be here. Or the gays down the street trying to adopt a child, because that's an abomination. Also, poor children shouldn't be allowed to eat food, climate change is a hoax, and if you disagree with anything I say I'm going to call you woke and unamerican. Why aren't people nice to me?"
Oh no, they're being judged by the content of their character instead of ~~the color of their skin~~ their genitals.
The whole whole article is whining about being mocked and provides nothing of value for why their views and conservatism do not deserve to be mocked. Nothing about what values they have that are laudable and popular with the masses.
Because conservate ideology is heavy on message and enpty of substance.
Progressives claim to value women...
Do they? I've never heard anyone say they value all women any more than I've heard anyone say that they value all men. Progressives, in my experience, value individuals based on their moral character rather than what genitals they have.
Zero tolerance for the intolerant. You want to be respected as a female conservative become a Democrat
Nah, intolerant dems can also pound sand. Intolerant people all around can fuck right off.
Right, zero tolerance for the intolerant.
This asshole is hiding behind her womanhood, using it as cover for her awful fascist worldview. Sorry, you being a conservative woman isnt the problem. You being a fascist is, and it justifies all of the scorn, ridicule, and social isolation.
This article is just another retread of the tired right wing cannard that claims intellectualism and critical thinkers must necessarily accept bigoted and authoritarian ideologies. The fear of this criticism is what fuels the weak, captulating nature of current Democratic leadership.
No, being open minded doesn’t require one to treat all ideas equally.
I should care, but we got rid of DEI.
Do conservatives ever just shut the fuck up?
Who knew that supporting fascism and circling wagons around a pedophile would have negative consequences in a society that generally frowns upon fascism and pedophilia.
Same as:
I'm tired of being hated just because I'm a horrible person.
At dinner, my kids and I discuss the Beatitudes
I tore an optic nerve rolling my eyes. Even Jesus himself probably gave it a rest at mealtime.
She's probably lying anyway.
Yeah, those kids were glued to their fucking ipads.
Maybe if you'd stop being a vile, despicable piece of shit people would like you more.
But The Post tried to smear her faith, personality and confidence from the start of the article: "Trump’s newest press secretary is radiant, blond and apple-cheeked ‒ as if one of Leonardo da Vinci’s Madonnas had been styled for a Fox News hit. Her delivery is righteous, if a bit smug. God gives everyone gifts, Leavitt believes; hers is public speaking. And for roughly a half hour, once or twice a week, she delivers Trump’s word to a room filled with professional skeptics."
If the trivializing of an accomplished woman wasn't so disgusting, I'd laugh. Can you imagine The Post smugly diminishing a progressive woman (or man) as "radiant, blond and apple-cheeked"?
What has Levitt accomplished?
Oh come on. Is there a word for this like Uncle Tom? Aunt what?
Stand up for your sisters or be stomped.
And for the record - I am a mom & got to stay home with some of my kids for a couple of years, love some D/s in the bedroom. I don't disagree with the lifestyle. I very strongly disagree with forcing everyone to get on board. Fuck right off with that. You do you and give everyone else the same consideration. Leave my kids alone.
Mammy, Aunt Jemima, and Aunt Thomasina are versions I've heard, but those are specifically racial. I don't think I've ever heard a specific name linked to... Gender treason?
Karen
Ahem, what's that favorite saying maga conservatives love to shout all the time? Oh yeah... "FUCK YOUR FEELINGS!" snowflake
Then stop being conservative?
they routinely demonize conservative women who refuse to conform to the molds that the left tries to force us into
The lack of self-awareness is truly astonishing.
DON'T FORCE ME INTO A MOLD THAT I'M ALREADY OCCUPYING OR I'LL CRY
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News