this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
424 points (99.1% liked)

News

23446 readers
3464 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

National Retail Federation says 2021 data was flawed and based on congressional testimony from president of an advocacy group

The powerful National Retail Federation (NRF) lobbying group has retracted a claim that “organized retail crime” accounted for “nearly half” of the shopping industry’s $94.5bn losses due to theft or “shrink” in 2021.

The industry group had said the impact of organized retail crime, which it previously claimed had increased by 26.5%, had become increasingly violent. Retail giants like Target, Walmart and Walgreens said it was threatening their businesses.

The NRF said the figure was based on a congressional testimony from Ben Dugan, the former president of an advocacy group, the Coalition of Law Enforcement and Retail, and that an analyst from K2 Integrity, a risk consultancy that co-authored the report, inferred the “nearly half” claim.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 128 points 1 year ago (4 children)

why the fuck do we even allow lobbying. bullshit fake gamified system that no proper country should have

[–] pl_woah@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Writing to your representative is a form of lobbying

An unsolicited expert opinion is lobbying

What's messed up is the amount of money to run and that citizens united made unlimited funds possible

Congressmen always worried about the cash they'll need to get elected

If there were term limits we would have faceless corporate buyouts with little experience, vs someone running on name recognition

Heck I want a campaign finance max limit.

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, term limits can't stop this.

Campaign finance reform can. Anyone running for office has a cap on how much can be spent. Political organizations also have a cap and they have to disclose who their donors are.

No more dark money.

I'd say we should go so far as to move to sortition (randomly selected people serving a term in office) but I am pragmatic.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I say we push all suffering and misery onto a single child and then live in the utopia that results.

[–] pl_woah@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

... That's what I just said. Are you a bot?

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think I hit reply to the wrong parent message. But either way, I'm totally not a robot..........

[–] shunir@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I'm totally not a robot..........

That totally sounds like something robot would say though... :p

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

An unsolicited expert opinion is lobbying

Right. Politicians know nothing about technology half the time, right?

Who does know - it’s people in the technology field.

They have to communicate somehow. Not saying it’s not broken today, and I think you could have a clever setup of advisors, but at the end of the day there will just have to be some kind of input by experts.

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Let's just skip all the bullshit and move straight to direct voting.

It's been proven that congress doesn't follow the will of the people, anyways.

[–] RazorsLedge@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Paragraph salad, delicious

[–] Alto@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because at least in theory, lobbying is at the core of a functioning republic. If you and couple neighbors get together to try to convince your county aldermen to fix some potholes, that's lobbying. Any time a person tries to influence their representative, it's lobbying. It's incredibly difficult to have actual codified laws that allow the things you want without also opening up tons of loopholes for corruption.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It’s incredibly difficult to have actual codified laws that allow the things you want without also opening up tons of loopholes for corruption.

Why do you think it's hard to separate the two? One involves receiving money or business perks and the other serves the community.

[–] Alto@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because directly receiving money is already illegal. Anything currently legal is so because it's protected by the same things protecting local organizations putting up flyers/billboards/radio ads/etc. Even stricter monetary limits don't really work, as you end up catching things such national humane society ads, because if they contain any messaging regarding support for legislation/wanting new legislation it's considered lobbying.

It's really just an intro to the subject, but Knowing Better has a great video on it. Great leaping off point. The very short and very inadequate TL;DW is essentially that "get the money out of politics" doesn't actually mean anything.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't have time to watch the video but I will later. It's never going to be possible to get the money out of politics 100%, but transparency and getting rid of super pacs would go a long way.

[–] Alto@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh there is absolutely more we could be doing, especially regarding tracking dark money spending. I was primarily pointing out that "we should just get rid of lobbying" is an almost entirely nonsensical statement.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is illegal in many places, but nearly impossible to enforce.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Experience. It's illegal in Brazil, no one has ever been convicted. It's a hard crime to define. It's like a law saying "strictly no ambling", but how do you differentiate from regular walking?

[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 55 points 1 year ago

The theft was coming from retailers. Raising prices without raising the cost of living accordingly isn't inflation; it's exploitation.

[–] catch22@startrek.website 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Bit of creative accounting. Blame shoplifters. Boom! Tax free profits.

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whaaaaaat, they’re lying????

[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

i wonder how many single family homes would have been necessary to store all those stolen goods.

[–] ItchySunItchyKnee@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What is this “Coalition of Law Enforcement and Retail”?

The article describes it as an advocacy group. But for what exactly? In my humble and biased opinion, these two things are very far apart (LE and Retail)

Edit: to -> two

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Advocacy for promoting lies.

[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In other words, a lobbying group.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

There are lobbying groups for equality, medical care, women's rights, chkldren's rights, and environmental protections and other topics that don't promote lies. Musicians and artists banded together as a group to lobby against censorship.

Just becsuse there are shitty lobbyists doesn't mean they all are.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

Most retail companies' Loss Prevention department works with local law enforcement, which I actually think is a good thing. Focus on the people who rob/use violence or teams of people who run out with carts full of expensive things to resell, not the single mom pocketing food...

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

You know who you don't see constantly complaining about retail theft, grocery stores. Probably because they have a business model resistant to the real cause of all these losses, online shopping and the decline of retail.

It's easier for the execs though to blame it on retail theft and tell their shareholders that they're gonna lobby Congress to lock up shoplifters and solve the problem, rather than tell them the business is slowly dying and there's nothing they can do about it.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Surprise, surprise: the industry lied.