65
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 49 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yeah sure. The 1200€ phone yields no profits... Poor Samsung can't catch a break

[-] warm@kbin.earth 21 points 4 days ago

Damn, poor Samsung, they certainly havent advertised and pushed for AI usage at all in their products! Oh and they certainly havent had record profits in other divisions!

[-] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

They need to tighten their belt, poor thing.

If people aren't buying it you get no profit.

[-] Thatuserguy@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Pretty sure the S26 was selling record numbers for them.

To be not turning a profit despite how expensive their phones are and being the only serious android manufacturer in the US, you're either lying, or so incredibly poorly mismanaged it's gotta set a new record somehow

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -5 points 4 days ago

being the only serious android manufacturer in the US,

...? Does "serious" only include companies that make the worst and also most expensive phones or what?

[-] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

Ask an average non-tech person about phones and they'll only know Apple and Samsung. They can suck but they're the only company that's serious about brand recognition and consistently making new generations of phpnes

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The non-tech people I know have been buying Google phones for years. Which have their own issues, but as products they seem light-years ahead of Samsung.

Op seems to be denying that Google phones exist, or that anyone knows about them? Which is odd to me, they're quite popular actually.

[-] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago

Thats not what it says. They say the single units are not profitable, as in it costs more to make them than they sell for

[-] smeg@feddit.uk 30 points 4 days ago

The reason for the reduction is, of course, the surging price of memory.

Maybe this will finally force lazy developers to optimise their programs a bit more. For decades we've had computers getting significantly faster every year so you didn't need to bother optimising your code for lower resources.

[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Nope, sorry. They're slopping everything with AI now so it has seven different subroutines that all do the same thing and are undocumented, and three different libraries have been imported with overlapping functionality.

[-] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I reviewed a PR the other day that added new test cases and was +40k LOC. It was the same file copy/pasted >400 times with a few strings changed each time. Guess what "super intelligence" wrote it

[-] smeg@feddit.uk 3 points 4 days ago

Yeah but if nobody can run their rubbish they won't survive for long

[-] 100_kg_90_de_belin@thelemmy.club 20 points 4 days ago

They can go f*ck themselves.

I stopped using Samsung products when they locked the bootloader with the One UI 8.5 update and before that I probably only skipped a couple of generations of Galaxy Note and Ultra phones.

I understand wanting to keep customers inside your ecosystem, but that should be done through convenience, not by holding hostage the hardware I already paid for.

[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

All they really mean, but won't say, is that memory makes them more money than phones - so they no longer give a fuck about phones.

Samsung Mobile division is complaining here that memory is so expensive they can't afford to put a phone out at a set price for more than a few weeks without starting to lose money.

Samsung Memory division meanwhile: our profits are so obscene that we've raised the entire company profits 800% this year.

Its literally two divisions in the same damn office, their directors sit in the same boardroom - Samsung Electronics.

[-] LeapSecond@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 days ago

With more companies claiming this and prices going up, could we go back to not requiring everyone has a newish smartphone?

[-] haywire7@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

That would require security updates etc to be done longer for phones so banking software and the rest will carry on working.

[-] LeapSecond@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago

This but also not requiring a smartphone for banking in general.

[-] prettybunnys@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago

the iPhone is right there, you can get an SE for ~499?

The 11 which came out pre-covid still gets regular updates alongside the other phones.

This is a uniquely Android problem.

[-] db2@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Or make phones that just phone. It wasn't that long ago they were like that. People didn't carry around direct access on demand and we didn't fucking die, we just didn't have instant gratification.

It would suck but we'd survive it.

this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2026
65 points (98.5% liked)

Android

22216 readers
104 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

🔗Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


💡Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

💬Matrix Chat

💬Telegram channels / chats

📰Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS