27

Basically the title.

For me, a dense model around 20b, with an additional engram table of 10-20b, or a sparse MoE around 80b would be amazing.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 1 points 5 days ago

30-35B or just under seems perfect to me.

[-] fancy_pants@reddthat.com 1 points 5 days ago

Something that would make good use of a 128GB spark. GPT-OSS-120b is good but shows its age

[-] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 12 points 1 week ago

gemma 26b-a4b was fantastic, anything in that area is ideal

running my tiny rx6600 8gb vram

[-] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh hell yeah

I'm on my 1070 8gb copium so we're twinsies

Maybe they release a huge moe model with non-uniform quants and then we can get even more quality on those cute little cards

[-] AceBonobo@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

How's your experience with the 1070?

[-] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 1 points 7 minutes ago

Mixed?

It's the lower bound of where LLMs are helpful. Anything less and the models would be either too slow to work or too dumb. With the 1070 they are already painfully slow but at least they're still good enough to do some menial tasks.

A good harness for web search etc does a lot though.

[-] ComradePedro@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

I have an M4 Pro 24GB and I still use Gemma 26B-A4B as my primary model. Beats every other model I’ve ever tried locally on most stuff except coding and tool use, so a Qwen 4 at this size would be super interesting

[-] e0qdk@reddthat.com 12 points 1 week ago

Another 35B-A3B MoE or similar would be nice...

FYI, Yandex released an 80B MoE base model (i.e. not instruction tuned!) recently: https://huggingface.co/yandex/AliceAI-Foundation-80B-A3B-Base -- haven't experimented with it personally though.

[-] robber@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

I hope an instruction tuned will be released as well.

[-] dosse91@lemmy.trippy.pizza 9 points 1 week ago

Flash next 125b is genuinely amazing, I hope to see 4.0 of the same size.

[-] tpWinthropeIII@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Agree, and upvoted.

Another good size would be 160 gb for 96 gb vram systems. After that I would like to see 225 to 250 gb.

[-] BeefAndPoultry@lemmus.org 5 points 1 week ago

32GB RAM and 8GB VRAM here, so 35b a3b is about my maximum, maybe with added n-grams

[-] fhein@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

27B dense was a good size for 3.8, but I'm guessing they're going to add a few B parameters in order to make it noticeably better.

[-] BeefAndPoultry@lemmus.org 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If they can make the KV cache size scale more efficiently with many tokens, like DeepSeek 4.1 Flash fitting 1 million tokens in 890MB, it might give them enough room to add a couple billion parameters of weights and still fit well in 32GB GPUs

[-] robber@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Not necessarly, I'd say. We've seen many releases with multiple sizes and the 27B class has been around since at least the Gemma3 times.

[-] fhein@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Well, it's just a guess. But also Gemma4 increased to 31B, so I think there's a possibility that Qwen does the same.

[-] ZephyrXero@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

They've changed the license with Qwen 4, starting with 3.8-next. So I probably won't be using any further releases

[-] fluxx@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

What are the significant changes? Requiring attribution or something more sinister?

this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2026
27 points (86.5% liked)

LocalLLaMA

5316 readers
45 users here now

Welcome to LocalLLaMA! Here we discuss running and developing machine learning models at home. Lets explore cutting edge open source neural network technology together.

Get support from the community! Ask questions, share prompts, discuss benchmarks, get hyped at the latest and greatest model releases! Enjoy talking about our awesome hobby.

As ambassadors of the self-hosting machine learning community, we strive to support each other and share our enthusiasm in a positive constructive way.

Rules:

Rule 1 - No harassment or personal character attacks of community members. I.E no namecalling, no generalizing entire groups of people that make up our community, no baseless personal insults.

Rule 2 - No comparing artificial intelligence/machine learning models to cryptocurrency. I.E no comparing the usefulness of models to that of NFTs, no comparing the resource usage required to train a model is anything close to maintaining a blockchain/ mining for crypto, no implying its just a fad/bubble that will leave people with nothing of value when it burst.

Rule 3 - No comparing artificial intelligence/machine learning to simple text prediction algorithms. I.E statements such as "llms are basically just simple text predictions like what your phone keyboard autocorrect uses, and they're still using the same algorithms since <over 10 years ago>.

Rule 4 - No implying that models are devoid of purpose or potential for enriching peoples lives.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS