51
What was the reason for the recent drop of the European far-right parties' social media engagement if it were not the Ukrainian strikes?
I suspect that what's happening here is complicated.
The strike will have taken out some bots because inevitably that's what the server farms will have been used for, at least partially. So there will have been some drop in traffic, the majority of the right wing traffic will have come from a minority of users so the drop was significant in terms of quantity of posts, even if it wasn't necessarily significant in terms of absolute numbers of individual accounts. But then also other accounts were less likely to post because they weren't getting backed up and retweeted as much, because the account that did all that were the bot accounts.
Wish it would take spam calls out
The AI-powered bots that were hosted directly on Yandex servers and could not be moved to a different server (or manually replicated) after the strike, those are the ones that certainly went down - but, of course, it's only a fraction of a highly distributed disinfo structure, and it will eventually rebuild elsewhere.
The servers that Russia would be most affected by in case of a disruption would be those of VKontakte - their local everything app, government paperwork manager and panopticon, VK Max, is of mandatory use in Russia to the detraction of all other messengers, so seeing VK's servers down would mean massive problems for the government
You can't tell?
Watch this: Trump is an ass!
See, normally THAT would be downvoted out of existence but THERE IT IS.
Putin is an ass, also. Let's test this further...
Try try again I guess
Russia's cloud infrastructure is highly centralized. There are very few, but large and juicy targets to hit that have a profound effect on the country's ability to function beyond digital force projection. The first wave of Ukrainian strikes against Russian data centers already knocked many services and companies offline.
Ironically, this is a self-own by the Russian government, which mandates Russian companies to use local services instead of foreign ones while at the same time encouraging this centralized infrastructure that they can easily control.
Data sovereignty is a good thing though. Starting wars is probably a bigger issue for a country than trying to keep their services local.
To be clear though there's a difference between data sovereignty and centralizing everything. My is to keep the data of the company I work for safe, secure, not subject to random deletion via virus / exploding drone / whatever.
If I kept all the data in one place in one data center I would be failing at my job. Even if we kept all that data in the same country is the company. Anything can go wrong when you have all your data in one place, the hosting could go out of business, they could pivot to AI, there could be a fire, that could be a cyber attack. You need redundancy.
Using that sovereignity for establishing a digital police state is pretty shit even without imperialistic dreams.
Haaaa ! Why can’t we have nice things
A lot of social media followers and boosters of right wing persuasion world wide were absent for a short time. A lot of x traffic is bots, that also slowed much to musk's ire. Not nearly as much as people are joking about, but not nothing.
Sources? The article tries to tell me the contrary.
Here you go.
Did you read the article? It specifically debunks some of those claims.
Your source pretends that all HTTP traffic is caused by bots as in the sense of "manipulative social media bots". However, Yandex is also a search engine.
One of the posts embedded in your article about the far right AfD in Germany is even directly debunked in the OP article.
Please read the BBC article linked, and possibly provide better sources for your claims, which aren't based on hearsay or doctored or misinterpreted statistics.
You are accusing me of not reading article only to come out with further claims you don't prove yourself. I don't engage in such a discussion. (And referring to OP: This account is well known in the meantime of spreading pro-China, pro-Russian narratives.)
Oh this is the most important thing to be talking about, clearly.
Well, do Russian bots have a big influence on global politics? Seems not unimportant.
Oh sure, generally it is an important concept for people who care about such topics. In the context of the war though it really feels kind of like silly propaganda. Like we have vastly more important things to talk about. For instance, Trump's decision to "buy" diesel from Russia.
Nah, it's actually a way more important topic than the Diesel "deal". The deal is useless and we knew Trump was a traitor before. But the most important thing for Ukraine is political and financial long term support from its European allies. And these systems are highly under pressure due to far right authoritarian parties, which are directly supported by the disinformation system of the Kremlin.
this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2026
51 points (98.1% liked)
Europe
12176 readers
1054 users here now
News and information from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS