696

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/53250107

Police confirmed they had responded to a report of "criminal mischief involving a robot" on the 1200 block of Filbert Street around 1:16 p.m. on Wednesday. A woman on the scene ignored "multiple commands" to move, they said, resulting in a criminal violation notice for disorderly conduct.

Uber declined to comment.

Marvin, who plans to contest the charge on the grounds of her First Amendment right to protest, has been undeterred by the arrest. She plans to continue blocking Uber Eats robots and chatting with curious passersby who ask what she's doing.

"It allows me to talk to people about what's going on," she said. "It's always very interesting conversations that we have, and I think it's good to have those kinds of conversations in public space."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 52 points 6 days ago

If you can block bots online, why can't you block them in the physical world?

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] Bluedragon012@lemmy.world 29 points 6 days ago

You know.. I'm surprised that no one has.. Done more? I'm surprised hunting these things isn't a trend..

[-] kalkulat@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I imagine that the non-violent sport of 'Robot-hassling' will emerge from pioneers like this before long. Tying a rope around it and to a tree will only be the start, with championships and awards for the simplest, cleverist and most-effective. Getting one to lose it will be high-ranking. There'll need to be a special section for electronic tricks and traps, and another for reality-shifting. Getting one to forget it's job and help you with gardening would be one fine example.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago

I wonder what a hand-held stun gun would do to it.

[-] peacepath@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago

Has it been set illegal to disobey "multiple commands" of a privately owned robot?

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

When police say somebody ignored commands, they mean from them. They don't get paid to enforce robot commands.

[-] Trashcan@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

But can they order you to move because you are standing in the way of a robot? Disobeying an order is arrestable, fair enough. Blocking a person is probably illegal (depending on how it's done). So I'm uncertain of the activity necessary to block such a robot. Just standing straight up an down in front of it sounds legal. Actively and continuously stepping in front of it to block it at least sounds worse. But how do you enforce this? What if a dog blocks or attacks a robot? What are robot/corporations rights?

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago

What if a dog blocks or attacks a robot?

Cops love to kill dogs.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Police get a lot of leeway when telling people to move. I suspect her blocking the robot, may be considered a public nuisance (like blocking traffic or a sidewalk). Her ingore a lawful command to move = jail.

note: this is not support of the robots, just indicating the fact that they are probably allowed under current laws.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

It has nothing to do with robots having rights - which they don't. It's about deliberately obstructing what another person is doing. Calling it "just standing straight up an down" doesn't change that, any more than if you refused to make way for somebody pushing a cumbersome shopping cart. How do you enforce this? Well, in this example the cops tried to tell the woman to move along, and arrested her when she refused. If a dog damages property you can sue the dog owner. If you have more questions please look them up yourself.

[-] Trashcan@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Of course it changes that. No where in time or space on earth have there been autonomous deliveries moving about in the same space as you or me. So the interesting philosophical and practical question is "who has the right of way". And as you say - "deliberately obstructing what another person is doing" when there is no person being obstructed. Someone may if may not be waiting. If I was on the receiving end of that meal, I would expect another drone delivering my food. Just as I expect packages to be rerouted if a delivery truck has a break down.

So the answer is "no one knows right now". Or to be presice, "no one, and especially not you, knows right now. And I for one will find it interesting when it is solved. Just not from you".

If you want more answers, please go look them up you yourselves - don't waste my or others time posting it here.

[-] Sunflier@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

This is basically the start of the counter to automation. We still tell fables about people who stood againt the devaluation of workers like this.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Hupf@feddit.org 15 points 6 days ago

ignored "multiple commands"

please move

[-] Monument@piefed.world 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The little nub on the top is a LIDAR module.

I wonder if an upside down cup will fit over it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] tigermountain@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Probably within a year Uber starts building these with extendable cattle prods that shock people to the ground that are in their way and then just crawl over them to finish their delivery.

[-] brownsugga@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

This is the stupidest thing

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 5 days ago

Next thing to do, put a VR headset on it, and let it take a magical mystery tour!

[-] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Why wasn't uber arrested for obstructing this woman's path with their shitty robot?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2026
696 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

89039 readers
3221 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS