155
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

Every system listed below is open source and not powered by Linux. Each has an ISO or installer you can boot today, and many of the picks can even run Linux applications.

Think of it as a list of operating systems that are friends with Tux but not friendly enough to call him inside for a cup of tea.

This list is not ranked.

Vinix

If you own an Apple Silicon MacBook and want a system that is neither macOS nor a Linux distribution, Vinix is aimed at you. Only the original M1 is supported today, and Alexander Medvednikov, the author of V, maintains the project.

The kernel is monolithic and written mostly in V, while part of it is C and assembly. Because memory is managed by hand, no garbage collector can interrupt a system call, and the security model borrows certain concepts from OpenBSD.

On ARM64, it runs Alpine Linux binaries natively, and pkg installs packages from Alpine's aarch64 repositories. ISOs for both x86-64 and ARM64 are available for virtual machine use.

A good pick if you enjoy poking at experimental kernels.

Asterina NixOS

Trying Asterinas NixOS means setting up a NixOS system and finding a Rust kernel where Linux should be. Asterinas is that kernel, and because it implements Linux's system call interface, apps for the Linux platform run on it.

The distribution is configured through Nix like regular NixOS, and unsafe Rust is allowed only inside a small framework called OSTD, while the rest of the kernel, along with its drivers, is safe Rust.

x86_64 is the fully supported platform, and ARM64 and RISC-V sit one tier below it. The project says the distro is not ready for production use and aims the installer ISO on GitHub at early adopters and enthusiasts.

A good pick if you follow the implementation of Rust in operating systems.

Redox OS

Where Asterinas swaps Rust in under NixOS, Redox OS builds the whole system from scratch in Rust. It’s a Unix-like OS with a microkernel design, and Jeremy Soller of System76 created and maintains it.

You get the Orbital desktop, a pkg package manager, and several apps from System76’s COSMIC desktop. Linux and BSD software has gotten much easier to port too, and the project has recently been focusing on making Redox boot reliably on real hardware, not just in a virtual machine.

A good pick if you want to see how far a pure Rust operating system has come

FreeBSD

FreeBSD is a complete operating system derived from BSD, the Unix version developed at the University of California, Berkeley. A large community maintains it, and its license lets companies keep their own changes private.

ZFS, jails, and a hypervisor sit at the center of what it offers. OpenZFS is built into the base system, and boot environments let you roll back a bad update by snapshotting the system first.

Its recent release, FreeBSD 15.1, came out earlier this year, and the OS runs on hardware platforms like AMD64, AArch64, Armv7, PowerPC, and RISC-V.

A good pick if you run servers, storage, or networking gear.

GhostBSD

GhostBSD is FreeBSD with the desktop work already done. The project pairs a FreeBSD base with the MATE desktop and offers a set of applications that make users feel familiar with using it.

The name started as shorthand for GNOME hosted by FreeBSD. MATE, the desktop it ships today, is a continuation of GNOME 2, and the old name still fits.

Updates arrive on a slow-rolling schedule, and the project says it values a stable cycle over chasing the newest software the way some Linux distros do. The current release, 26.1-R15.0p2, came out in April on a FreeBSD 15.0 base.

Also good to know is that Linux binary compatibility comes preconfigured, and an installer built on OpenZFS keeps setup approachable for newcomers.

A good pick if you want FreeBSD as an everyday desktop.

Haiku

Haiku is an open source operating system inspired by BeOS that is aimed at personal computing. The same team writes the kernel and the desktop applications, with the project crediting that approach for the system's consistent interface.

Under that interface sits a kernel built for responsiveness, a system that is multithreaded throughout, and a BFS file system whose indexed metadata lets Tracker, the file manager, run database-style queries across a drive.

Software installs are handled via packages that mount into the system, and earlier states are kept for rolling back botched updates.

A good pick if you are looking for a uniform desktop experience.

ReactOS

ReactOS comes with a warning label attached because the OS is still considered alpha-level software, and the download page promises nothing about stability, the safety of your files, or whether it would work on your hardware.

Behind the warning is a full operating system with a Windows-style desktop that the project says was written from scratch, while most of its user-mode code is based on Wine, the ubiquitous compatibility layer.

By default, it installs only onto a FAT16 or FAT32 partition, and Btrfs support is experimental.

A good pick if you want to see how far an open source Windows reimplementation can go.

FreeDOS

If you have old DOS games, legacy business software, or a BIOS flashing tool that won’t run anywhere else, FreeDOS is the one to grab. It’s a complete MS-DOS compatible operating system, started by Jim Hall in 1994 and still maintained today.

It runs on everything from an original 8086 to a modern PC, though newer machines need legacy BIOS mode or UEFI with legacy boot turned on. The requirements are tiny too: 640 KB of RAM and about 20 MB of disk space for a basic install.

You get a Live CD, a USB installer for real hardware, a Legacy CD, and even a floppy edition. I’d start with the Live CD in a virtual machine, which is also what the project recommends for most people.

A good pick if you want to run DOS games and legacy software on real hardware.

KolibriOS

KolibriOS is an operating system small enough to fit on a floppy disk. Which sounds weird because no modern computer comes with floppy disk anymore. Even CD drive are rare these days.

But then, the KolibriOS is not meant for modern computers anyway. You need just an i586 processor, 12 MB of RAM, and a few megabytes of disk space. It doesn’t follow POSIX either, so don’t expect to port your Unix tools over.

The kernel and drivers are written entirely in FASM assembly, which is why it boots to a GUI in seconds and opens apps almost instantly.

Despite its tiny size, you get a text editor, an image viewer, a graphics editor, a web browser, and over 30 games. It fully supports FAT12/16/32 and can read NTFS, exFAT, and ext2/3/4 partitions.

The project is still very active, so worth considering it in your retro tool kit.

A good pick if you are into retro computing or if you want to keep the 90s computer alive.

A suggestion

Try these operating systems in a virtual machine before switching. I say that because it’s a good habit to test out such non-standard pieces of kit before committing to them on your hardware.

First see what works for you. Then see if your workflow and usage habits align with what the OS offers. Once you settle on one, keep it updated so you never miss critical patches.

Air-gapped setups are better protected from such risks, of course.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] turkalino@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 week ago

TempleOS not mentioned, garbage list

[-] lime@feddit.nu 18 points 1 week ago

templeos is public domain, which is incompatible with open source

[-] provectus@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

templeos is public domain, which is incompatible with open source

Where did you come up with that conclusion?

[-] lime@feddit.nu 6 points 1 week ago
[-] provectus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

From what I understand from the article is that public domain's legality can be questioned (especially in germany), therefore they conclude that it is not opensource, similar to how releasing software with no license is not OSS. That is where licenses like in the article CC0 come in play and unlicense to help create legal public-domain-like software.

In templeOS case

TempleOS is 100% open source with all source present.

From https://github.com/cia-foundation/TempleOS/blob/archive/ReadMe.TXT

[-] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 1 week ago

i get that it's terry, but just saying "it's open source" feels a lot like the "i declare bankruptcy" bit. he didn't actually waive any rights there.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 1 week ago
[-] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 1 week ago

source available != open source. unless explicitly rejected by the creator through a license or waiver, all the immaterial rights of any work still rest with them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] genchu@sakurajima.social 6 points 1 week ago

@lime@feddit.nu @turkalino@sh.itjust.works is that actually true? I'm more so to the side of Free/Libre Software because I disagree with the Open Source Initiative on many things, but from my knowledge public domain software (if provided with the 4 freedoms) should be considered both Free/Libre as well as Open Source?

[-] beyond@linkage.ds8.zone 5 points 1 week ago

The public domain is a concept in copyright law where a work has no copyright holder, either because the copyright expired or because (in TempleOS's case) the copyright was voluntarily relinquished. However, note that it's entirely jurisdiction-dependent (for example, it's not always even possible to relinquish a copyright, and copyright expiration also varies by jurisdiction). As copyright is a state-granted monopoly on distribution rights, if no one has that monopoly, there are no restrictions on copying and hence the freedom to modify and distribute the source code is available to all. Note that copyright is automatic upon the creation of a work and does not need to be registered, so either an explicit declaration from the author or knowledge that the copyright term is expired is needed to know something is in the public domain.

In short, if something is in the public domain (as the preferred form for modification i.e. source code) it is free software and open source, but the idea that public domain is somehow incompatible with FOSS is a somewhat reoccurring talking point that came up very recently. I don't know where this came from but I imagine it has something to do with the discourse on copyright on LLM generated work.

However, it's usually best to use an explicit license so you can affirm your intent to release the software as free.

FSF recognizes public domain as a category of free software (although, in their pedantry, they are quick to point out that it is not a "license"):

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#PublicDomain

OSI says more or less the same thing although they also elaborate on the actual legal complications of the public domain, and recommend explicitly using a license if possible:

https://opensource.org/faq#public-domain

[-] provectus@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Public domain just means you waive your copyrights. Unlicense is a license that helps you get your piece of software into public domain and is OSI approved. I prefer public domain over permissive licenses because it is easier to release a gpl version of them over permissive licenses (public domain does not have any restrictions). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public-domain_software

[-] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 1 week ago

public domain generally means you can't relicense or copyright works using it. the osi doesn't like that. the gpl is also not open source for the same reason.

[-] genchu@sakurajima.social 3 points 1 week ago

@lime@feddit.nu can you expand on that? GNU (A/L)GPL version 3 is OSI approved

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

You mean TinkerOS.

[-] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 week ago

Redox OS, Haiku, and NetBSD are the major alternatives that are taking a stand against AI contributions. If the Linux kernel isn't forked at some point, I could see those alternatives getting more attention in the future.

[-] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Honestly I still don't get why there isn't a GNU BSD fork yet. I have low spectations on a Linux kernel fork.

Linux is becoming more and more hostile to software freedom.

[-] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It was called kFreeBSD, and it was shut down in 2023.

Part of the problem is that Linux has become far too monolithic, and dependent on Linux-only services and applications.

There's no systemd on FreeBSD and likely never will be. There were several years of development necessary to implement Wayland, because instead of fixing what was wrong with Xorg, impatient linux developers just threw it out and started over. And wrote it to use Linux kernel syscalls which then have to be copied and implemented across any other operating systems that want to use it.

Even my beloved KDE is falling into that trap with their new Wayland login manager that depends entirely on systemd. Which is a Linux only thing.

[-] provectus@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I am worried that we are becoming too dependent on Linux(kernel) and systemd. I think it would be very hard to maintain a fork of Linux and systemd because their codebases are very large, and develop at a really fast pace (ai will make this even worse).

Of course these are my opinions, but I wonder if anyone shares them as well besides me.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm living fine on Systemd-free Artix? Even replaced the elogind with seatd. Scanning, printing, compiling, AUR, all A-ok in all (except Gnome now) desktop environments.

[-] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago
[-] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Now that's name I've not heard in a long time.

[-] jcr@jlai.lu 11 points 1 week ago

Second time this list comes out and NetBSD is not listed ... That GNU Hurd is not listed can be understandable, but NetBSD ?

[-] frankenswine@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

WDYM understandable?

I thought 2026 was the year of the Hurd desktop

[-] jcr@jlai.lu 2 points 1 week ago

Well from what I know it is not running on hardware but only on virtual machines, nlt as much as an "alternative" than the others

[-] frankenswine@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

it is running on hardware. we only recently gained 64bit support

but yeah, most users would expect a bit more

[-] jcr@jlai.lu 2 points 1 week ago

Oh ! Good news 😁 I will check again then

[-] lime@feddit.nu 8 points 1 week ago

also oh god V is still around?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] KullumDaue@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

and which one of them supports my nvidia gpu? 😅

[-] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

No OpenBSD/NetBSD?

[-] dai@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Asterina NixOS.

Man gonna have to test that on my spare laptop. Quite interested to see how development progresses.

[-] balsoft@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

From what I've read on the discourse it's not really usable yet. Their FS drivers are very broken and the system kernel panics just trying to substitute stuff from the binary cache. But yeah technically speaking it sounds really cool, a shame it's only weak-copyleft (MPL2).

[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

I still try out Haiku and ReactOS on actual hardware every time a new version is released. None of my computers are fully supported yet.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

TempleOS enters the chat.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 1 week ago

kolibrios has blobs in it :(

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Blame modern hardware.

Btw, anyone compiled it for ESP32 or DaBao?

[-] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 1 week ago

...compiled? it's all written in x86-specific assembly language. you'd have to rewrite it from scratch.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago
[-] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

I was thinking of trying out Debian Hurd, anyone using it?

[-] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Asterina NixOS

Wait this actually exists now?

[-] kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Picotron runs on lua

[-] protogen420@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

GenodrOS, GloireOS both are gpl, and rarely mentioned

[-] EugeneNine@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

AROS is another

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2026
155 points (96.4% liked)

Open Source

49765 readers
326 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS