369

Former President George W. Bush’s brother, Neil Bush, has revealed he voted for Democratic candidate James Talarico for U.S. Senate in Texas, calling Donald Trump's bid to overturn the 2020 election "an affront to our democratic institutions."

"I voted early today, and I voted for James Talarico for the United States Senate," the Texan businessman wrote in a post on Facebook on Tuesday in a snub to Republican candidate Ken Paxton.

The 71-year-old son of former Republican President George H. W. Bush and chair of his father's nonprofit Points of Light, wrote that while he has been a Republican for most of his life, character “matters more than party affiliation.”

top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] fulcrummed@lemmy.world 69 points 1 week ago

That’s actually pretty surprising, and for a conservative - impressive.

[-] StabbingSky@lemmy.zip 64 points 1 week ago

Paxton being a piece of shit is a non-partisan thing. There's even a commercial with a former Republican state representative advocating for Talarico

[-] fulcrummed@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

Agreed - just surprising for me that someone with brand name recognition would make that choice vocally.

[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 week ago

The Texas legislature also tried (but failed) to impeach him. An FBI inquiry into his office had the deaths of two major whistleblowers. Man is corrupt af and probably in some sort of cartel/gang thing. He is not liked and he should not be allowed anywhere near political power so I expect Texas will elect him.

[-] moakley@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

He was impeached. But then he was acquitted by Republicans.

[-] felixthecat@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago

Don't count texas out. Talarico is polling well and currently has highest levels of early voting in a non presidential election in texas history.

[-] FullPenguin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Modern partisan politics seem to require GOP candidates to be pieces of shit.

The only consistent policy of today's Republicans is to do whatever will make sensible people push back, which has led to a party full of pedophiles, criminals, corruption, incompetence, and treason.

[-] Azal@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago

I mean, I live in Missouri, Josh Hawley being a piece of shit is a non-partisan thing. But the second it comes to choices, they'd rather that instead of voting for democrat.

I'll give credit for a conservative doing the bare minimum. It is very difficult for them to remove their lips from the asses of the party leadership.

It fucking shouldn’t be. Democrats are perfectly “conservative” enough for corpos and even farmers. Republicans want to kill poors through legislation.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

MAGA hates the Bushes. This is just a quick moneymaking story, not really news as such.

[-] massacre@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Former President George W. Bush’s brother, Neil Bush, has revealed he voted for Democratic candidate James Talarico for U.S. Senate in Texas, calling President Donald Trump's bid to overturn the 2020 election "an affront to our democratic institutions."

That's an interesting take given how George W "won" the election against Gore by having the conservative majority SCOTUS stop the Florida re-count effectively handing W the presidency. Final counts have shown Gore would have won if the recount wasn't stopped "because it was taking too long". They would have finished within a day....

[-] Manjushri@piefed.social 15 points 1 week ago

Come on now, they had to stop the counting. Don't you remember the Brooks Brothers Riot? There were acts of violence! People were rioting! Well, not people as such, Republican Staffers mainly, at the direction of Roger Stone. But still, something had to be done!

[-] stringere@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

The wikipedia page has more information for those who want to know: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brooks_Brothers_riot

The amount of government malfeasance that just sails past so many many many people here is disheartening.

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And W's other brother was governor of Florida at the time. No conflict of interest there!

[-] KC_Royalz@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Well when you have armed gunmen storm a voting center and those in power in Florida not holding them responsible. Votes don't get counted

[-] nastronot@lemmy.zip 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Paxton is truly a lizard person.

They aren’t voting for Talarico as much as voting against that cretin.

Why the TX GOP went along with this is amazing to me. Haha just kidding. The TX GOP is litterally all lizard people.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

They aren’t voting for Talarico as much as voting against that cretin.

They don't want two Ted Cruz representing Texas. Talarico is someone you can negotiate with. Cornyn was, too. Paxton is just a stubborn climbing sociopath who only knows how to turn rightward

[-] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 week ago

Damn I thought Jeb! was back

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago
[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I’m crapping while I read this.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 26 points 1 week ago

"I'm from the Bush family, and his corruption is shocking even to US!"

[-] Malica@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 week ago

I had no idea there was a third brother.

[-] BlackSwan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago

There's also Marvin, you can always tell a Milford Man

[-] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago

I still can't confirm his existence as I haven't seen or heard him.

[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I've made a huge mistake

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

most polls show Talarico narrowly ahead of Paxton in the closely watched Senate race that could determine party control of the chamber.

Good on Neil Bush for speaking his conscience on this. Regardless of his personal beliefs, he spoke up. And he deserves credit for that.

Texans who vote for Ken Paxton are a complete disgrace to their state and to their country.

[-] Akasazh@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

It's a bad look ik the most nepotist neo conservative enablers look like the sane people in the room. GW was a massive idiot who ruined many things about the America people yearn for nowadays.

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

No child left behind gave us the crop of MAGA voters today. They are all dumb as rocks because of W's policies

[-] NathanRanch@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

Turns out we were right about Bush all along. We just didn't realize the consequences.

[-] nickiwest@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

I don't know many MAGA voters who are 18-26.

I know a lot of them who are 65+, though. We can't blame NCLB for their idiocy.

[-] ElChinchilla@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I was trying to think of a good way to convey exactly this.

[-] 3abas@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

You should wonder why they're okay with democrats of today instead of doubling down that these ghouls must be sane now.

[-] Sirdubdee@piefed.social 15 points 1 week ago

Other* brother. I knew about one. Finding out he had another after so many years is blowing my mind.

[-] stringere@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

I'm with you there.

[-] PNW_Doug@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Too monstrous for a monstrous family to vote for, that’s quite the accomplishment there, Paxton.

[-] Kcap@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

TIL, Neil Bush. That's it. Never heard of him.

[-] chahn.chris@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago

You love to see this kind of thing.

I hope more old school republicans start coming out and saying this exact thing.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Paxton kicked the anthill when he primaried Cornyn.

[-] rumimevlevi@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

If I was a member of a war criminal, I would never show my face in public gathering ever

[-] tetris11@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

But America loves its war criminals

[-] skhayfa@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

We plundered and waged wars but we at least did it with style

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

Another?! Two spawns of HW was already two too many!

[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

This is getting out of hand. Now there are ~~two~~ three of them

[-] Beero@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago
this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2026
369 points (99.2% liked)

politics

31633 readers
2750 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS